1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NeX [460]
1 year ago
7

S head of the committee, it is up to you to implement the decision. Based on your decision, answer these three questions:

History
1 answer:
Elina [12.6K]1 year ago
8 0

As head of the committee, the person that is responsible for change is known to be the change implementer or change manager.

<h3>What resources are needed to make Change?</h3>

The keys that are needed to implement changes are:

  • A vision
  • The skills
  • An  incentives
  • Resources materials
  • A action plan.

In regards to change and its implementation, resources are said to be important because they helps to bring about an improvement in the working environment, by lowering the amount of resources that the firm  needs as well as securing good supplies of materials and better competitiveness.

Therefore, As head of the committee, the person that is responsible for change is known to be the change implementer or change manager.

Learn more about change from

brainly.com/question/25816978

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Read the quotation from the Omaha Platform. “The fruits of the toil of millions are boldly stolen to build up colossal fortunes
tangare [24]
The correct answer is
<span>The wealthy often profit from the hard work of the lower class.

The idea is that the lower class works hard while the rich ones reap what the lower class earns. The rich get richer while the poor get poorer. This is a very Marxist way of thinking because Marx himself claimed this and claimed that the classes should be abolished.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Ottoman Empire likely entered into the conflict referred to in the passage because?
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

it had lost significant territory to other European states in the nineteenth century.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements best describes a change that impacted African Americans in the 1950s?
vlada-n [284]

Correct answer:  Court cases challenged the legality of discrimination.

I'll mention key court cases after debunking the other answers in the list.  Truman's desegregation of the armed forces happened already in 1948, and impacted only those in the armed forces, rather than all African Americans.  The suburbs were NOT welcoming toward African Americans, and they remained in living mostly in urban centers.

As to key court cases of the 1950s regarding discrimination:

1950: Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents.  In these cases, the Supreme Court said segregation of African American students in law and graduate schools was unconstitutional.  This was the start of challenging "separate-but-equal" policies.

1954: Brown v. Board of Education.  Firm decision that "separate but equal" policies were unconstitutional across the education system.  Chief Justice Earl Warren, speaking for the unanimous opinion of the Court, said: “Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”  

1955: Brown v. Board II.  The Supreme Court directed that school systems must abolish segregation “with all deliberate speed.”

1956: The Supreme Court affirmed a lower court ruling that the segregation of the Montgomery, Alabama, bus system was illegal.  This was in reference to the bus boycott that had begun with the protest by Rosa Parks.

1958: Cooper v. Aaron.  The Supreme Court upheld the US Court of Appeals (8th Circuit) decision that resistance by local officials and threats of violence in the community did not  justify delaying desegregation.  This followed in the wake of the Little Rock Nine (a group of black students) seeking enrollment in LIttle Rock Central High School.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
skad [1K]

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

7 0
3 years ago
HELP ASAP!
nevsk [136]

Command economy advantages include low levels of inequality and unemployment and the common good replacing profit as the primary incentive of production. Command economy disadvantages include lack of competition and lack of efficiency

While there are several advantages to a traditional economy, these economies are not without their disadvantages. Because these economies rely on hunting, fishing, gathering, and the land in the form of farming, when the weather changes, the economy becomes jeopardized

A mixed economic system is a system that combines aspects of both capitalism and socialism. A mixed economic system protects private property and allows a level of economic freedom in the use of capital, but also allows for governments to interfere in economic activities in order to achieve social aims. According to neoclassical theory, mixed economies are less efficient than pure free markets, but proponents of government interventions argue that the base conditions such as equal information and rational market participants cannot be achieved in practical application.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to john smith why did chief powhatan decide to spare smith's life
    9·2 answers
  • Which two philosophies helped to maintain a strong central government in China?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the code napoleon?
    5·1 answer
  • To what does the writer compare the United States in this paragraph?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the small physiographic region in Georgia which is largest
    5·1 answer
  • Why were the Israelite kings David and Solomon important?
    15·2 answers
  • The map depicts areas under Allied and Axis control.
    12·1 answer
  • The new boundary line set by the Adams-Onis Treaty had which of these effects? (5 points)
    13·2 answers
  • As the Roman Empire expanded, Roman art developed by
    5·1 answer
  • What problems did the National Convention face? How did this problem impact how revolutionary leaders began to treat suspected t
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!