1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Whitepunk [10]
1 year ago
14

How do you think would history have been different if Lincoln had not been assassinated? How might his leadership after the war

have differed from that of Andrew Johnson?
History
1 answer:
Alla [95]1 year ago
8 0

I feel that Reconstruction and the postwar period would have been more historically beneficial and ambitious if President Lincoln hadn't been slain. Lincoln, in my opinion, would have done more to combat numerous injustices in America, both politically and socially.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What is President Lincoln?</h3>

Generally, In 1861, Abraham Lincoln was elected as the 16th President of the United States, and in 1863, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed for all time any slaves who were living inside the Confederacy.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that Reconstruction and the post-war period would have been more historically beneficial and ambitious if President Lincoln hadn't been slain.

This is based on my research. I believe that Abraham Lincoln would have been able to do more politically and socially for the United States, as well as do more to fight against the numerous injustices that exist in our nation.

Read more about President Lincoln

brainly.com/question/25971195

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What skills led to Martin Luther King becoming a leader in the struggle for equality?
aleksley [76]
His strong work ethic 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the importantance of the northwest ordinance?
statuscvo [17]
The Northwest Ordinance was the most important of the three different acts. It was important because it enabled the government of the Northwest Territory to become a part of the union.
4 0
3 years ago
in the late 1840s what led to the question of whether slavery should expand to the territories or not
ELEN [110]
The results of the Mexican War
7 0
3 years ago
The ottoman empire was able to conquer Anatolia because of their use of Janissaries and
Alika [10]
gun powder
<span>Janissaries</span> were loyal soldiers trained to use small arms. They were regarded the most loyal of the sultan troops, and were also highly trained and disciplined. These disciplined forces were unlike the disorganized soldiers of Anatolia who also did not have gunpowder reserves.


6 0
3 years ago
To revise the language in an informative essay, a writer should work on the
schepotkina [342]

A. An effective outline states whether reference sources are credible or biased.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Supreme Court case McCullouch v. Maryland ensured that?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these countries has not ratified the international women's bill of rights?
    11·1 answer
  • How did each progressive era president view the role of the federal government?
    11·1 answer
  • Who is the president as of right now
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Collier's friends stimulate publicity about the Bursum Bill?
    8·2 answers
  • What were the legal rights of slaves relative to their masters in the late 1600's under the Barbados Slave Code?
    9·2 answers
  • Who was the first explorer to cross the Atlantic to get to the Caribbean Sea?
    14·2 answers
  • I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST and everything if you give me a good answer and explain it
    14·1 answer
  • **PICKING BRAINLIEST! WORTH 20 POINTS**
    10·1 answer
  • {I NEED THIS ASAP} I need help, I have a History project I need to do, but I have to come up with a cool different way of saying
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!