1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Whitepunk [10]
1 year ago
14

How do you think would history have been different if Lincoln had not been assassinated? How might his leadership after the war

have differed from that of Andrew Johnson?
History
1 answer:
Alla [95]1 year ago
8 0

I feel that Reconstruction and the postwar period would have been more historically beneficial and ambitious if President Lincoln hadn't been slain. Lincoln, in my opinion, would have done more to combat numerous injustices in America, both politically and socially.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What is President Lincoln?</h3>

Generally, In 1861, Abraham Lincoln was elected as the 16th President of the United States, and in 1863, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed for all time any slaves who were living inside the Confederacy.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that Reconstruction and the post-war period would have been more historically beneficial and ambitious if President Lincoln hadn't been slain.

This is based on my research. I believe that Abraham Lincoln would have been able to do more politically and socially for the United States, as well as do more to fight against the numerous injustices that exist in our nation.

Read more about President Lincoln

brainly.com/question/25971195

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
The main problem that the settlers faced was?
scoray [572]

Answer:

The two main problems that the settlers of Virginia face was an inability to properly farm to the extent where they had enough food, and hostile Native Americans, whose patience had run thin with the settlers who were always trying to expand their settlement.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why would some historians regard the GI Bill as a "success" and why would others regard it as a failure?
Valentin [98]

Answer: Because the GI Bill was successful for only part of the population.

Explanation:

GI Bill is a law passed in 1944 promoted to help soldiers mobilized during the 2nd world war to rejoin in the society. The benefits that the soldiers would have are; financial aid by a year, facility to obtain loans of a house or small business and financing of its technical or university studies. This economic drive led to economic and social development between 1950 and 1960.

However, even though the law intended to help all soldiers, there was discrimination and segregation when it was granted; African American soldiers and women were less benefited, or had greater obstacles to obtaining benefits; for example, universities did not allow people of color to enroll, and they were not granted financing to purchase housing.

For this reason, the GI Bill was a success for white soldiers returning from the war, but it did not equally benefit the entire population, with African Americans and women being discriminated against.

<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the parliment tax sugar in 1764
AURORKA [14]
Earlier in the 1700s, the French & Indian war happened in which Great Britain was involved in. They made taxes so they could pay all of their soldiers for fighting in the war.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is the treaty of Paris beneficial to the United States
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

yes it was

Explanation:

As a result, Treaty of Paris terms were very favorable to the United States with Great Britain making major concessions. ... Resolved issues with American debts owed to British creditors. Provided for fair treatment of American citizens who had remained loyal to Great Britain during the war.

4 0
3 years ago
How did the progressives believe that the reforms they proposed to municipal government would improve society?
netineya [11]
Here is the correct answer of the given question above. The progressives believe that the reforms they proposed to municipal government would improve society because they believe that i<span>t was inefficient and corrupt because of the power of urban and political machines. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for. Thanks for posting it here in Brainly.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In order to add a salad bar to a school lunch menu for students with restricted diets, new materials or ___________ such as a re
    5·1 answer
  • Basin on data presented in your lesson, which one of the following individuals would most likely to vote?
    14·1 answer
  • If you visited an asylum in the 16th century in europe you would likely find ________
    11·1 answer
  • What is a characteristic of prehistoric people
    15·1 answer
  • In about 50 to 70 words, explain three ways that studying at medieval university would have been different from studying at a mo
    8·1 answer
  • Provide one specific piece of evidence that demonstrates how Europeans funded exploration and trade New World in the period from
    11·1 answer
  • A. evaluate the extent to which the Spanish-American War (1898) marked a turning point in American foreign policy
    10·2 answers
  • Please answer for me. No links no files no pics
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of human interests impacting plans to open the Panama Canal?
    14·1 answer
  • The Sherman Anti-Trust Act was created
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!