<u>X - Intercept</u>
f(x) = -x² + 4x - 4
0 = -x² + 4x - 4
x = <u>-(4) +/- √((4)² - 4(-1)(-4))</u>
2(-1)
x = <u>-4 +/- √(16 - 16)</u>
-2
x = <u>-4 +/- √(0)
</u> -2<u>
</u> x = <u>-4 +/- 0
</u> -2<u>
</u> x = <u>-4 + 0</u> x = <u>-4 - 0</u>
-2 -2
x = <u>-4</u> x = <u>-4</u>
-2 -2
x = 2 x = 2
The solution to the problem is {2, 2}, or {2}. The x - intercept of the problem is (2, 0).
<u>Y - Intercept</u>
f(x) = -x² + 4x - 4
f(x) = -(0)² + 4(0) - 4
f(x) = -(0) + 0 - 4
f(x) = -0 + 0 - 4
f(x) = 0 - 4
f(x) = -4
The y - intercept of the problem is (0, -4).
<u />
Answer:
88%
Step-by-step explanation:
35 because 2x-3.45.there is the answer 35
Answer: A.
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis
: A statement describing population parameters as per the objective of the study. It usually takes "≤,≥,=" signs.
Alternative hypothesis 
: A statement describing population parameters as per the objective of the study. It usually takes ">, <, ≠" signs.
Let p be the proportion of screens that will be rejected.
12 percent of the screens manufactured using a previous process were rejected at the final inspection.
(i.e. p= 0.12)
Objective of the study = whether the new process<em> reduces </em>the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
i.e. p< 0.12
So, the appropriate hypotheses to investigate whether the new process reduces the population proportion of screens that will be rejected:
Answer:
y = 23
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming the equation not below is y = mx + b form...
m = 4
x = 3
b = 11
y = 4(3) + 11
y = 12+ 11
y = 23
