The best answer according to judaism, christianity and islam-- is that the ideal of life is?

1 answer:

3 0

According to Judaism, Christianity and Islam, The purpose of life is to live in harmony with the will of god.

<h3>What is Islam?</h3>

Islam is the religion of Muslim people who has the faith in Allah. It is a monotheist religion, which means that it preaches only one god named Allah. The name of their prophet is Mohammad.

Judaism is another religion that believes that the nation can be repaired through the directives of god.

Christianity believes that the person can be saved from the sin by keeping the faith in Jesus.

Islam's religion tells praying and follow the instructions of Allah to lead the peaceful life.

Therefore, it can be concluded that The aim of life, according to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, is to live in accordance with the will of God.

Learn more about Islam here:

brainly.com/question/11489285

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

______ were a music record label category that targeted african-american audiences.

Ludmilka [50]

Race Records was a music record label category that targeted African-American audiences.

5 0

3 years ago

Woodland Indians hunted and gathered much of their food. However, they did learn to

Leona [35]

Answer:

idkklkkkkk

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

The Declaration of Independence asserted that every citizen has certain "unalienable rights" that have been granted to them by t

svetlana [45]

Answer:

Unalienable rights are those which cannot be taken away. They are guaranteed and you can't forfeit or give them up.

3 0

3 years ago

How does our society view boys and girls

scZoUnD [109]

Is this the hole question

7 0

2 years ago

A state statute provides: "Any merchant desiring to sell within this state any product or goods manufactured outside of the Unit

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.

Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.

5 0

3 years ago