<span>The Intolerable Acts not only attacked the economic rights of people in the Massachusetts colony, but also removed their system of self-rule and representative government. The Intolerable Acts closed the port of Boston to imports and exports, appointed a military governor, barred town meetings, and prevented the election of local officials and the selection of jurors. Although colonists viewed earlier tax acts and acts to control trade as unconstitutional, this act actually deprived them of their civil rights. The Magna Carta and British Bill of Rights of 1689 indicate that the King is not above the law, and that certain civil rights are granted to British subjects to ensure that the King does not become to powerful. Among these rights are the right to trial by a jury of one's peers, and the power of taxation resting in the hands of an elected body. Both of these rights were removed with the tax act. The colonists had no form of economic or political defense against the King's absolute rule in Massachusetts.</span>
Answer:
I would say the one that is most right, is, "They extended the rights of citizenship to new groups."
Explanation:
Most of the amendments, from the 13th amendment to the 27th amendment were passed after the civil war, so that is incorrect.
The amendments also made it much easier for many groups of people to vote. In fact, many of the amendments center around allowing groups of people to vote, and have citizenship.
Which leads me to the answer which I believe is correct, which is, "They extended the rights of citizenship to new groups."
There can be many benefits and down sides to this, in return for helping these countries you gain an ally. Although you have to spend your own money. All in all it is worth it in the end because you have another country you can trust.
Fundamental attribution error defines a tendency to underestimate the effects of external or situational causes of behavior and to overestimate the effects of internal or personal causes.
Fundamental attribution error (FAE), also referred to as correspondence bias or attribution effect in social psychology, is the propensity for people to overemphasise dispositional and personality-based explanations for an individual's observed behaviour while underplaying situational and environmental explanations. The term "tendency to believe that what people do reflects who they are" has been used to characterise this effect, which is the tendency to overattribute people's actions (what they do or say) to their personalities and underattribute them to the circumstance or context. The mistake is in assuming that someone's actions are exclusively indicative of their personality rather than that they are partly indicative of it and primarily by external factors.
Learn more about Fundamental attribution error
brainly.com/question/15466443
#SPJ4
Answer: Shortage
Explanation:
The equilibrium price is the price at which the demand for a particular product and its supply is equal.
When the price of a good is below the equilibrium price for that good, this will more people demanding the good which will therefore lead to a situation where the quantity demanded is less than the quantity that is supplied. This leads to a situation called shortage.
