Dr. Beswick was writing questions for a test, but found herself listening to reggae music coming from an adjoining office, and thinking about her upcoming trip to the Caribbean. She is experiencing <u>attentional deficit</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Attention deficit disorder (ADD) is a kind of neurological disorder that causes difficulty in concentration, lacking attention and facing many problems in completing tasks and social interaction.
Brain injury, genes and exposure to environment toxins are some of the causes of the attention deficit disorder.
In the above scenario, Dr. Beswick was attending a test. She was distracted by the reggae music that was coming from the adjoining office. After listening to the music she started thinking about her upcoming trip to Caribbean. Dr. Beswick was affected by attentional deficit disorder.
Pretty sure it was a parrot.
Answer:
b. cannot test his theory because his observations violate the ceteris paribus assumption
Explanation:
As per the law of supply, when price of an input rises, quantity supplied of a good falls, keeping other factors affecting supply as constant (ceteris paribus).
Leather and Shoes are complimentary goods in the sense that leather serves as an input for the product i.e shoes. So if the price of leather rises, production of shoes would fall, keeping other factors constant.
When the price of an input rises, the quantity supplied falls, keeping other factors affecting supply as constant.
In the given case, the price of inputs has increased and yet the production of shoes has increased owing to an advancement in the technology. Technology is a different determinant of quantity supplied and considered as an other factor affecting supply.
The correct answer to the question above is:
D. Quantitative
<span>Quantitative research approach is used in this
scenario because the participants are asked to choose among the most functional
mobile phone and compare them with other options. The data gathered from
participants are then analyzed to make a substantial result. </span>
When new firms have an incentive to enter a competitive market, their entry will BRING DOWN PROFITS OF EXISTING FIRMS IN THE MARKET.
This is because, those customers who are patronizing the existing firms before will start patronizing the new firms.
