Post a picture or something because that doesn’t make any sense
Answer: C. Both parties now have an obligation to their agreement.
Explanation:
When parties get into a contract, they have a legal obligation to each other to fulfill their part of the agreement or the other party will be able to seek redress in a court of law.
Terrance and the bank are now parties to an agreement to provide Terrence with a loan to buy a house. The bank will have to fulfill this obligation by giving Terrence the loan and Terrence will fulfill his side of the agreement by making payments as stipulated in the loan covenant.
Answer:
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
economic order quantity, EOQ= 55 units
annual demand, D=235
holding cost per one unit per year, H=40%×$11=$4.4
ordering cost, S=?
In order to calculate the ordering cost we would have to use the following formula:
EOQ=√(<u>2×D×S)</u>
(H)
Hence, S=<u>(EOQ)∧2×H</u>
2×D
S=<u>(55)∧2×4.4</u>
2×235
S=<u>13,310</u>
470
S=$28.31
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order
Answer:
task based maybe ?
Explanation:
if it's correct than mark me brainliest
