<span>The answer is DNA. There are several ways to obtain DNA samples, like blood, saliva, semen or hair. They are very important to guarantee a certified verification of the people involved with the situation and guarantee the best investigation possible of the event.</span>
Tone of voice is simply about the attitude that's behind the statement that is made by an individual. It's important for one to smile when talking with customers.
Tone of voice is the attitude behind what a person is saying. It should be noted that the way that an individual speaks to other people matters.
It's important to use positive language. Therefore, one should avoid saying words like "we can't" etc. It's also important for one to use a friendly tone and smile at their customers.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25626996
<span>mario's plan of gathering information before selecting a class is a demonstration of: </span><span>decisional control
Decisional control is an information gathering process that carried AFTER the decision is made. It carried out only to get further information that could be used to manage the decision that already made</span>
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
