The French Revolution was waaaaay more violent. In the French Revolution they were beheading and killing monarchs and aristocrats while the U.S one wrote a Declaration of Independence. The guillotine was made specifically in the French Revolution for the main purpose of killings the upper class. So many more people died in the French Revolution and it was the first time that a country had reacted so violently to their government. There was even a cult dedicated to the French Revolution and so many people in the underclass were killed either because they were not radical enough or because they would help the aristocrats escape
Answer:
-econemey
-ecomic dependence on britian
-higher racism
-poverty and colonization
Explanation:
When Britian colonized in India it cuased the econemy to crumble by having high taxes and the most money going to british/euopean immigrents, even if it was native Indian peoplewho did the most work. This becuase that is who the best and most high paying jobs. (white euorpeans) India then became depente on britian for econimcic support. Also with the best jobs goign to White britsh people. this left Fewer jobs and resources for Indian peoples, cuasing higher rates of poverty and colonization
This should be enough of an explation for a summerized understanding to get you started.
Please Please Please do not just Copy this for anything other than notes
thanks (rewording is fine)
Answer:
...“The father of modern economics supported a limited role for government. Mark Skousen writes in "The Making of Modern Economics", Adam Smith believed that, "Government should limit its activities to administer justice, enforcing private property rights, and defending the nation against aggression." The point is that the farther a government gets away from this limited role, the more that government strays from the ideal path... How this issue is handled will decide whether the country can more closely follow Adam Smith's prescription for growth and wealth creation or move farther away from it.”
Jacob Viner addressed the laissez-faire attribution to Adam Smith in 1928...
Here is a list of appropriate activities for government, which goes way, way beyond Mark Skousen’s extremely limited – and vague – 'ideal' government. That ... he goes on to attribute his ‘ideal’ list to Adam Smith ... is not alright.In fact, its downright deceitful, for which there is no excuse of ignorance (before attributing the limited ideal to Adam Smith we assume, as scholars must, that Skousen read Wealth Of Nations and noted what Smith actually identified as the appropriate roles of government in the mid-18th century).
It happened in the 1800’s it allowed a lot more people to get paid more from their jobs resulting in a higher standard of living. This is where unions came in the picture, they wanted 8 hour work days and no child labor. The gilded age is known as a prosperous time for the nation but the government was very corrupt. There were corrupt industrialists, bankers and politicians who stole and benefited from the working class.
*The trans continental railroad made more people move west and created “robber barons”
*Since the government was corrupt muckrakers became a thing, the muckrakers exposed government corruption and such
This question goes a lot deeper, so if you want to know more just ask in the comments
Answer:
Option B- Reagan’s purpose was to remind Americans of their freedoms and to encourage Soviets to allow more individual freedom.
Explanation:
Just took the test on edge2020
