Answer: 204.76%
Explanation:
In the earlier scenario, furniture maker manufactured 47 (42 non defective) pieces per 5 laborers working 8 hours day.
Thus, the productivity in terms of units per labor hour is as follows:

= 1.05
Similarly, after the process improvement, the productivity in units per labor hour would be:

= 3.2
Thus change in productivity would be calculated as:

= 2.047 × 100
= 204.76%
Thus, the productivity of non defective parts would increase by 204.76%.
No the electronic devices where made to text and easier to text
Answer:
A change in the real money supply can result either from change in the nominal money supply through Federal Reserve policy ( holding the price level constant) or from a change in the price level( holding the nominal money supply constant).The change in the nominal money supply causes a shift of the aggregate demand curve, whereas a change in the price level causes a movement along the aggregate demand curve.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is $2,610.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
We can calculate the the direct labor cost by using following formula:-
Direct labor hour required= Estimated production × Direct labor hour
= 870 × 1÷4 =217.5 hours
Direct labor cost = Direct required labor hour × Rate of labor per hour
= 217.5 hours × $12
= $2,610
According to the analysis, $2,610 is the total amount to be budgeted for direct labor.
Answer:
B. If the building could be sold, then the after-tax proceeds that would be generated by any such sale should be charged as a cost to any new project that would use it.
Explanation:
The proceeds from a potential sale are the opportunity cost of using the building for a given project instead of selling to a third party. Not including any cost will lead to project not recovering the entire capital used in it.
Is important to notice this is the after-tax proceeds from the sale of the building.