The prices of Japanese goods will increase.
<h3>Economic Principles of Demand and Supply </h3>
Following the principles of demand and supply, the higher the price, the higher the quantity supplied (all other factors remaining constant).
Recall that cost of production for Japanese goods has also increased according to the question. When prices increase, suppliers sometimes want to take advantage to create even additional inflation in order to get additional profit. Hence they put out more goods at the instance of increased prices.
See the link below for more about the law of supply:
brainly.com/question/4803223
Answer:
For such a report , the sql query required would be:
SELECT emp_id, curr_salary, curr_salary*1.03 AS inc_salary FROM Employee;
Explanation:
For such a report , the sql query required would be:
SELECT emp_id, curr_salary, curr_salary*1.03 AS inc_salary FROM Employee;
In the above sql query employee id is emp_id , curr_salary is the current salary column. "curr_salary*1.03" is been made because an increment of 3% means salary + salary*3% , that is , salary*1.03.
Answer:
(c) 7.5 bars, 2/15 shirts
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is simply defined as the next best alternative.
Opportunity cost also refers to the loss of foregone gain which could have resulted had a non chosen option been selected over the chosen option. For instance, the opportunity cost of storing money at home is the average market rate of interest which would've been earned had the same money been invested.
In the given question, the opportunity cost of a t shirt would be :
= ![\frac{30\ Protein\ Bars}{4\ T\ Shirts}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B30%5C%20Protein%5C%20Bars%7D%7B4%5C%20T%5C%20Shirts%7D)
= 7.5 protein bars
Similarly, the opportunity cost for a protein bar would be:
= ![\frac{4\ T\ Shirts}{30\ Protein\ Bars}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B4%5C%20T%5C%20Shirts%7D%7B30%5C%20Protein%5C%20Bars%7D)
= ![\frac{2}{15} \ T\ Shirts](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B15%7D%20%5C%20T%5C%20Shirts)
Thus, the correct option is (c) 7.5 bars, 2/15 shirts
Answer and Explanation:
Arguments for U.S. Company offshoring:
1. Cost savings:
Companies usually offshore manufacturing or services to developing countries where wages are low, thus resulting in cost savings. These savings are passed on to the customers, shareholders and managers of these companies.
2. Skills:
The competitive advantage of nations often means that some countries or regions develop a much better ecosystem for certain types of industries. This means there is better availability of skilled human resources in that region for specific types of tasks. For example, India and the Philippines have a large pool of English-speaking, college educated youth; as well as a mature training infrastructure; that makes it ideal for business process outsourcing. Therefore, many companies choose to offshore certain business functions (e.g. call centers for customer support) to these locations.
Arguments for U.S. Company offshoring:
1. Quality Control:
While companies can set quality standards for work performed by foreign employees, language and cultural barriers, as well as overseas supply chains, can present barriers to quality control. Products made overseas can be flawed because of out-of-date or worn equipment in overseas factories, or substandard raw materials. In 2000, for example, Masterlock had to recall more than 750,000 locks made in China. Worn dies at the Chinese factory produced locks that could be pulled apart without a key.
2. Public Image:
In times of high unemployment in the United States, sending jobs out of the country can hurt a company’s public image. Fewer regulations in other countries can make it less expensive for American factories to operate, but environmental damage and labor abuses that make the news can tarnish the image of companies involved there. Consumers have organized boycotts against companies that use child labor or sweatshops to produce clothing and shoes. In response, companies such as Nike, Dell and Gap have established codes of conduct for their suppliers.
Answer:
$2,160
Explanation:
Total costs = Beginning Balance + Direct materials + Direct labor+ Overhead
Total costs = $5,400 + $21,600 + 16,200 + $10,800
Total costs = $54,000
Total transferred out = Total costs - Ending Balance
Total transferred out = $54,000 - $4,590
Total transferred out = $49,410
BGIP transferred out = Total transferred out - Assumed started and completed units cost
BGIP transferred out = $49,410 - $41,850
BGIP transferred out = $7,560
Cost to complete BGIP = BGIP transferred out - Beginning Balance
Cost to complete BGIP = $7,560 - $5,400
Cost to complete BGIP = $2,160