In order to overcome the free-rider problem interest groups often provide selective benefits to their members.
The free-rider problem is a problem in economics. it is considered an instance of a market failure. this is, it's far an inefficient distribution of goods or offerings that happens when a few people are allowed to consume extra than their honest proportion of the shared useful resource or pay much less than their honest percentage of the charges.
The free-rider problem is a monetary idea of a market failure that happens whilst humans are taking advantage of sources, goods, or offerings that they no longer pay for. If there are too many free riders, the sources, goods, or services may be over-provided. consequently, this will create a loose rider problem.
The free rider problem may triumph over thru measures that make sure the users of a public accurate pay for it. Such measures encompass government moves, social pressures, and gathering bills—in particular conditions wherein markets have located a way to do so.
Learn more about the free-rider problem here:-brainly.com/question/25800077
#SPJ4
Answer:
The court ruled against both Americar and Regency Inn, and then Regency Inn won its case against Americar. The nuisance case itself is pretty unpleasant, so it's not worth referring to it.
The fundamentals for the ruling against Americar were that they themselves had drafted the lease agreement and that the clause included in the lease agreement by which they agreed to indemnify Regency Inn was valid. The original lease term had already expired, but Americar continued to lease the offices on a monthly basis. Since they never left the place, the clauses in the original agreement were still valid even though the lease changed to a monthly basis. I.e. if you sign a lease contract and after the original contract is over, you continue to lease the same place, then the clauses from the original contract still apply.
The clause stated that Americar was liable for damages that took place on the leased premises or in their proximity, i.e. the area near their offices. The parking lot was considered to be in the proximity of Americar's offices.
Answer with Explanation:
The introducing of newest technology would definitely have financial and operational implications. These implications are given as under:
Financial implications
- Cost Reduction: The operational costs would be reduced by investing in the newest technology which will make the cash flow position better with time.
- Benefits Lost Risk: It is possible that the investment might not bring value to the company because of any emergent problems, whose mitigation requires incurring of additional costs.
- Cost Advantage: The lower operational cost can drive higher sales because the company will be charging lower fare prices to its customer thus giving Cost Advantage.
- Investing in newest technology might not bring value to the company because it is not attracting potential customers but it might pay off later in the form of developed customer loyalty.
Operational implications
- Implementing a newest technology might improve the operational processes through which the customer go through, which would increase the customer satisfaction.
- Implementation problems of newest technology.
- Long term Customer retention will easy for the airline company due increased customer satisfaction.
- Operational efficiencies related to services will process the customer fastly saving the companies precious time wasted in these process thus reducing the future human resource cost.
- Using robots might bring adverse marketing because the people might think that the human resource are no more required and risks associated with the acceptance of technology due to cultural differences.
- Better Security systems would increase the security level and safety levels for the customers.
It’s B :) because it ensures what fits best to the company about employees idk if that make sense.
Answer:
$62,160
Explanation:
Given:
Purchase price = $300,000
Down payment = 10% of purchase price = 0.1 × $300,000 = $30,000
Thus,
the cumulative amount to be financed = $300,000 - $30,000 = $270,000
The present value of an annuity of $1 per year for 8 years at 16% = $4.3436
Now,
Annual payment
= ( Cumulative Amount financed ) / ( Cumulative PV factor at 16% for 8 years)
= $270,000 / 4.3436
= $62,160.42
≈ $62,160
