1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrew [12]
1 year ago
15

Exercise 1 In the blank write n if the italicized word is used a noun. Write p if it is used as a pronoun. Write v if it is used

as a verb. Write adj. if it is used as an adjective. Write adv. if it is used as an adverb. Write c if it is used as a conjunction. Write prep. if it is used as a preposition. Write i if it is used as an interjection.
Why, you’re the news anchor for the Channel 10 news!
English
1 answer:
s2008m [1.1K]1 year ago
8 0

The word WHY is an interjection in this sentence.

A word or phrase that seems to be semantically distinct from the words around it and predominantly reflects feeling rather than meaning is termed an interjection.

The description of the main interjection?

  • Individual words and sounds that are only employed as interjections are known as primary interjections. Like the words from previously in our program, "oops," "huh," "woohoo," "ow," "ouch," and "yum," they have no further uses or meanings.
  • An interjection is a phrase or word that abruptly or exclamatorily expresses something, usually an emotion.
  • The form of an interjection can be a single word, a term, or even a brief clause. In addition, they are typically (though not always) included at the start of a sentence.
  • The value of interjections resides in their ability to express sentiments that might otherwise go unspoken in a statement.

To learn more about Interjection, visit:

brainly.com/question/1563418

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Why do you think Mrs. Schater kept screaming even though she was getting beaten for it?
nignag [31]

Answer:

Mrs. Schachter kept screaming "fire" even though she was getting beaten for it because she had foreseen what will happen to them, the Jews. She is like a warning for what will be the fate of the people and how most of them will end up.

Explanation:

The memoir <em>Night </em>by Elie Weisel tells the story of how the Jews were discriminated against and treated inhumanely by the German Nazis. The book became one of the most read and first-person accounts of the horrors of the Holocaust, one of the greatest genocide in world history.

Mrs. Schachter and the captured Jews were stuffed into the cattle cars and transported to other camps for their imprisonment. She was with her ten-year-old son. Along the way, she began screaming <em>"Fire! I see a fire! I see a fire! [. . . .] This terrible fire. Have mercy on me"</em>. This happened not just once or twice but more than thrice. She was badly beaten up for causing panic among them and was even gagged. But she kept on shouting about the fire.

Her 'vision' of the fire seems to be the<u> foreshadowing of the fate of the Jews</u>. Most of them will be put in the chamber and burned. She seems to foresee what will happen to them. And even though she was beaten up for shouting and claiming she saw a fire, she kept on repeating her claim to warn them of their fate, which, unfortunately wasn't understood by the people at that time.

6 0
3 years ago
Using the spelling rules you learned, determine which of the following words is spelled incorrectly.
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

The 2nd one is spelled wrong

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A syllable is a unit as spoken language larger than phoneme<br> True or false
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:True

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
In paragraph 19, Turkle poses a set of rhetorical questions (queries not meant to be answered directly). Find an example. What e
Margaret [11]

Answer:

I don’t know if this is right. But Teurkle wanted to make us think. She wants us to think about the question but not actually answer it. Just expand our brains.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Refer to the Newsela article "The Relationship between Hunger and War."
Aneli [31]

Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.

Explanation:

In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.

Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Commodore Matthew Perry's expedition in 1853 to Tokyo to force trade with Japan displayed the use by the United States of A. iso
    15·2 answers
  • Revise into a thesis statement.10. The Allied Healthcare field is a nice career choice.
    13·1 answer
  • punctuation missing....kimmy thought she had one fourth of the money that the other student did, but she was wrong.
    6·2 answers
  • What is the meaning of affinity​
    7·2 answers
  • Mrs. Hayashi's husband is killed in the war.
    7·1 answer
  • Which type of text would be most appropriate for Scott to gain a broad overview of the factual events leading to the Civil War?
    13·2 answers
  • 16. That is the house<br>where<br>I used to live.​
    6·1 answer
  • You see a boat filled with people, yet there isn’t a single person on board. How is that possible? its a riddle :D
    8·2 answers
  • U<br>Nobody lielped<br>helped her at her school​
    12·1 answer
  • I’ll give a free 50points if someone helps Pls help me TIMED ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!