Answer:
For wealthy Romans, life was good. They lived in beautiful houses – often on the hills outside Rome, away from the noise and the smell. They enjoyed an extravagant lifestyle with luxurious furnishings, surrounded by servants and slaves to cater to their every desire. Many would hold exclusive dinner parties and serve their guests the exotic dishes of the day.
and for the poor
,
Poorer Romans, however, could only dream of such a life. Sweating it out in the city, they lived in shabby, squalid houses that could collapse or burn at any moment. If times were hard, they might abandon newborn babies to the streets, hoping that someone else would take them in as a servant or slave. Poor in wealth but strong in numbers, they were the Roman mob, who relaxed in front of the popular entertainment of the time – chariot races between opposing teams, or gladiators fighting for their life, fame and fortune.
Although their lives may have been different, they did have some things in common. In any Roman family life, the head of the household was a man. Although his wife looked after the household, he controlled it. He alone could own property. Only he decided the fate of his children and who they would marry.
Explanation:
I think it’s gerrymandering
Marginal product is an extra unit of acommodity that is produced from employing one extra unit of input
Answer:
Suggestibility
Explanation:
In psychology, the term suggestibility refers to the process by which we accept and act under the suggestions of others. When we're talking about memory, this phenomenon happens when <u>we fill gaps in our memory with information that other persons give to us (by remembering an event).</u>
In this example, a fake crime was committed and a man with brown hair and blue jeans and green long-sleeved shirt stole a woman's handbag. Later, many "witnesses" (some of them were staged) said that the man was wearing a hat, so later when they were questioned by the police, many witnesses actually said that the man was wearing a hat. We can see <u>how the influence of the other people (the staged "witnesses") made the normal witnesses fill the gap in their memory with the information that this fake witnesses gave to them ("The man was wearing a hat")</u> and therefore, this explains suggestibility.
