In diversity of citizenship cases, if a case involves multiple plaintiffs with separate and distinct claims, _____.

1 answer:

3 0

In diversity of citizenship cases, if a case involves multiple plaintiffs with separate and distinct claims must satisfy the jurisdictional amount.

Diversity jurisdiction is a type of subject-matter jurisdiction recognized by U.S. law that enables federal courts to hear disputes without a federal question at issue.

There are two requirements that must be satisfied for a U.S. federal court to have diversity jurisdiction over a case.

The plaintiffs must be citizens of different U.S. states than the defendants, which is known as "diversity of citizenship," between the parties. Second, the "amount in controversy" in the case must exceed $75,000.

These two requirements must be met for a lawsuit to be considered in a federal court in the United States, unless it raises a federal issue in which case it must be heard in state court.

Learn more about diversity here:

brainly.com/question/14696671

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Usulan dasar negara pada sidang BPUPKI pertama

Luden [163]

I can't understand this it's a different language

8 0

3 years ago

The text's example of the teacher calling roll and asking, "now, where is . . ." and a student replying "ernesto?" because he kn

Korvikt [17]

I believe the answer is: Communication is collaborative

Which mean that in order for a communication to be formed, both the giver and receiver of the message should play their own role properly.

The giver of the message had the role to ensure the delivery of the information happen clearly, and the receiver had the role to ensure that he/she provide the necessary attention and cognitive process to receive the message.

8 0

3 years ago

Why was the Exodus a significant event in Hebrew history?

MrRa [10]

That is when the children of Isreal where free
are you a CHRISTIAN too

7 0

3 years ago

Kody is a member of the L.A. Crips. The other gangs in his territory are the Bloods and Satan's Slaves. Kody feels very antagoni

Mademuasel [1]

The correct answer is letter D.

Explanation: Out-Groups: With other evolutionarily close groups, where cladogenesis has been anterior.

7 0

3 years ago

Congress can disagree with the opinion of the Supreme Court by

stealth61 [152]

Answer:

The right option which is the best option to be taken by the Congress is to impeach the Supreme Court judges for their opinions which is option 3.

Explanation:

Removing someone from the Court would require an investigation and formal charges by the House Judiciary Committee, a majority vote in the House, a trial in the Senate, and a two-thirds majority.

This approach would need extremely compelling grounds for removal in order to gain support from more than 20 Republicans. As a practical matter, the House would need new information such as abuse of office, financial improprieties, or further evidence of sexual assault or perjury to provide the basis for removal, while the search for material would itself be easily criticized as partisan. .

3 0

3 years ago