Okay I think there has been a transcription issue here because it appears to me there are two answers. However I can spot where some brackets might be missing, bear with me on that.
A direct variation, a phrase I haven't heard before, sounds a lot like a direct proportion, something I am familiar with. A direct proportion satisfies two criteria:
The gradient of the function is constant s the independent variable (x) varies
The graph passes through the origin. That is to say when x = 0, y = 0.
Looking at these graphs, two can immediately be ruled out. Clearly A and D pass through the origin, and the gradient is constant because they are linear functions, so they are direct variations.
This leaves B and C. The graph of 1/x does not have a constant gradient, so any stretch of this graph (to y = k/x for some constant k) will similarly not be direct variation. Indeed there is a special name for this function, inverse proportion/variation. It appears both B and C are inverse proportion, however if I interpret B as y = (2/5)x instead, it is actually linear.
This leaves C as the odd one out.
I hope this helps you :)
Given:
Replace f(x) by f(x - h).
To find:
The effect on the graph of replacing f(x) by f(x - h).
Solution:
Horizontal shift is defined as:
If the graph f(x) shifts h units left, then f(x+h).
If the graph f(x) shifts h units right, then f(x-h).
Where, h is a constant that represents the horizontal shift.
In the given problem f(x) is replaced by f(x - h) and we need to find the effect on the graph.
Here, we have x-h in place of x.
Therefore, the graph of f(x) shifts h units right to get the graph of f(x-h).
Answer:
its 12
Step-by-step explanation:
you find whats closest for example, 10 squared is 100.
100 is close to 144
and 11x11= 121
so you would do 12
12x12 is 144
