1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
V125BC [204]
1 year ago
12

Who was the babylonian ruler responsible for the fall of assyria and nineveh? nabopolassar nebuchadnezzar zedekiah jehoiakim

History
1 answer:
yKpoI14uk [10]1 year ago
3 0

Nabopolassar Babylonian ruler was responsible for the fall of Assyria and nineveh.

Who was the nabopolassar ruler?

Nabopolassar Babylonian ruler was responsible for the fall of Assyria and Nineveh. In the heartland of Assyria Kingdom, the weakness and the instability was prevailing severely due to the death of the Assyria’s king Ashurbanipal. The new Babylonian leader wants to establish a new independent kingdom in the south.

During the Neo-Babylonian era, in which the empire was Nebuchadnezzar II. He made the military very powerful as well as he became the far reaching empire. As a result of this the nation was destroyed and carried away into captivity. The last empire was Nabonidus and he developed North Arabia.

To learn more about the nabopolassar ruler from the given link:

<u>brainly.com/question/3942226</u>

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
In a short paragraph describe some of the ideas that you think we’re the most effective and those that should have been revised.
Andrew [12]
What topic is this over?
5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following arguments can best be used to support the claim, "freedom of religion is directly tied to democracy"?
Daniel [21]

Answer:The Constitution of the United States said little about religion. ... the Constitution did not prohibit the kind of state-supported religion that had flourished ... alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand. ... potential critics who might claim religious discrimination in eligibility for public office.

Explanation:

The Constitution of the United States said little about religion. ... the Constitution did not prohibit the kind of state-supported religion that had flourished ... alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand. ... potential critics who might claim religious discrimination in eligibility for public office.

6 0
3 years ago
The student government has some power in our school, as a group of students they advise the principal on new rules and help plan
Margaret [11]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

its the student council

5 0
2 years ago
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is it Quartering Act
Ratling [72]

The Quartering Act is a name that was given to two or more Acts of British Parliament requiring local governments of the American colonies to provide the British soldiers with housing and food. Each of the Quartering Acts was an amendment to the Mutiny Act and required annual renewal by Parliament.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to historical records, the last eating implement to become commonly used at tables in europe was the
    8·2 answers
  • Which term is best associated with the separatist movement in Quebec?
    12·2 answers
  • Under president ronald reagan, the united states had the largest peacetime military buildup in history. how was this a challenge
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELPPPPPP OMG! when did alaskans first enter alaska?
    13·2 answers
  • What does the bill of rights limit
    9·2 answers
  • U.K. History
    5·1 answer
  • What was the Knights of labor name?
    7·1 answer
  • Why was there so much controversy around the 2000 election? How did the Electoral College figure in this? How does this election
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the Mexicans move to Texas
    12·1 answer
  • How did President Wilson attempt to gain the public’s support for the League of Nations?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!