Answer to question 1:
i think the reason why the play writers of “The diary of Anne Frank” made the story of anne into a play to being the struggle she went through in the attic to life.
Reasoning: The story of Anne Frank should be told to being light to the trauma Jews faced in WW2
Answer to question 2: The story of Anne Frank is a hard story to tell and could get a lot of backlash if not created according to what happened in her diary. The challenges are also being able to act out some of the challenges the story had and to bring the story to light with out being to dash because the holocaust is still considered a very touchy topic.
i hope this helped :)
<span> It is presenting reasons, explanations, or steps in a process. Logical order should be used with appropriate sequencing of ideas or steps in a process. Effective </span>expository<span> writing should contain a main idea, supporting details, and a conclusion.</span>
Answer:
I believe the best answers are:
blank 1 -- C) that has
blank 2 -- A) NO CHANGE
Explanation:
The original sentence, "...the US government has the power to take custody of land when having historical significance or great natural beauty" is a bit ambiguous. Who has historical significance? We assume it is the land. But, in the way it is phrased, it could also be the government. To eliminate such ambiguity, the best option is letter C) that has. It will help determine a certain land can be taken. What land? The one that has historical significance.
As for the sentence, "The designation of a territory as a national park, national monument, or other types of protected area can limit activities," I don't see any reasons for changes. Especially because of the word "other", which needs to be completed by a plural noun - eliminating options B and C. Letter D wouldn't be incorrect, but the transformation of "protected area" into an adjective for "types" is unnecessary. The sentence is perfect the way it is and, therefore, needs NO CHANGE.
