Spartans were the first ones to present the democratic society (combined with monarchy) more than 150 years before Athens.
<span>How come?</span>
<span>With two kings,Gerousia,ephoroi and democratic assembly NO one had an absolute power(while mathematically democratic assembly made from all citizens had the most power,even to exile kings), and all (Elders,Ephoroi,Kings,Assembly) controlled and limited the power of each other. </span>
<span>So the assembly of all male citizens (their representatives) basically ruled Sparta.What is that if not democracy? </span>
<span>Athenians did no such thing,their "democratic" system was an absolute power of an assembly that was consequently very popular pray for power hungry,and the place in it was won by all kinds of unmoral deceptions,misuse of poor blind and illiterate etc</span>
<span>Being passive or not military effective has nothing to do with democratic society...Contrary to the popular belief Spartan citizens were not repressed...they wished and believed in what they were doing. How undemocratic was Athenian society clearly shows their treatment of women.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
By Tom Jawetz July 22, 2019, 4:45 am
Restoring the Rule of Law Through a Fair, Humane, and Workable Immigration System
Getty/Mario Tama
New U.S. citizens gather at a naturalization ceremony, March 2018.
OVERVIEW
Policymakers must break free of the false dichotomy of America as either a nation of immigrants or a nation of laws, and advance an immigration system that is fair, humane, and actually works.
PRESS CONTACT
For more information and updates on this topic, see CAP’s series: “Reframing the Immigration Debate.”
Introduction and summary
The immigration debate in America today is nearly as broken as the country’s immigration system itself. For too many years, the conversation has been predicated on a false dichotomy that says America can either honor its history and traditions as a nation of immigrants1 or live up to its ideals as a nation of laws by enforcing the current immigration system.2 Presented with this choice,3 supporters of immigration—people who recognize the value that immigrants bring to American society, its culture, and its economy, as well as the important role that immigrants play in the nation’s continued prosperity—have traditionally seized the mantle of defending America as a nation of immigrants.4 By doing this, however, rather than challenging the dichotomy itself, supporters have ceded powerful rhetorical ground to immigration restrictionists, who are happy to masquerade as the sole defenders of America as a nation of laws.5 The fundamental problem with this debate is that America is, and has always been, both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. Debates over a liberal immigration policy actually predate the start of the nation itself; they infused the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, America’s founding document.6
GET THE LATEST ON IMMIGRATION
Email
Steam because they had steam engines for the first time during the industrial revolution.
Answer:
States will have a different set of laws
Explanation:
Then the laws in each state will be different and the Congress and Senate can change the laws so every state has to enforce it or not. You could go into another state to do something illegal even if it isn't enforced.
