Answer:
The battle of who should hold more power, the national government or the states, is perhaps the most seasoned battle in American history. Many believe that the states should hold more control over the national government, yet I differ sometimes. In the present society we have progressing banters about numerous points that worry general society. One of the huge issues that gets talked about frequently is whether maryjane ought to be authorized or not. I am fair with regards to this specific point, yet I do have a solid feeling on who ought to choose. At this moment, there are a few states around the nation that have authorized it, however the National government has not. This makes things incredibly confounding most definitely. The other concern I have is with the detained populace because of cannabis infringement. I think that its unjustifiable that there are individuals getting detainment charges for accomplishing something that another resident in a neighboring state is openly doing. I comprehend that individuals are worried about the possibility that that on the off chance that we permit the national government to settle on choices like this, at that point they will develop to be excessively ground-breaking, however I differ right now. There are measures set up to adjust the forces of the government, and we should confide in what the organizers had as a top priority when they drafted the constitution. At the point when they made the constitution, they gave the central government all the forces they figured they ought to have Article 1 area 8. They did this with the aim that they would shield the central government from getting excessively huge. The originators were clever people however, and they realized that the issues written in 1787 would not be the main ones to cross the ways of the American individuals. Considering this they included the "essential and legitimate statement", which was added to guarantee they could manage issues that emerged later on.
Answer:
The answer to this question is C. analyze findings, draw conclusions, and make recommendations intended to solve a problem.
Explanation:
A proposal is a plan or suggestion, especially a formal or written one, put forward for consideration by others. It is a write up that shows the intention of a writer and one seeks approval from others.
An effective proposal must showcase the writer's expertise and build credibility, get the reader's attention. analyze findings, emphasize how the writer's methods and products will benefit the reader.
However a proposal is not a research work, therefore it should not include analysis of findings, drawing of conclusions and making recommendations intended to solve a problem.
Hence the right answer is C. analyze findings, draw conclusions, and make recommendations intended to solve a problem
Hi there! I think the answer is C, Hope this helps!:D
<span>If a consumer was asked to rank different combinations of goods and services terms of how much utility they provide, then a bundle with a total of 112 cds and dvds would rank higher than a bundle with a total of 10 cds and dvds, if based on total of goods only. This does not take into account the contents of the media.</span>
<u>Answer:</u> Sunk cost
<u>Explanation:</u>
Sunk cost means the expense which has been already met by the firm and they cannot be recovered at any rate. Sunk costs are not based on the future decisions as these expenses for the firm are the same irrelevant to the project which it is assigned. Sunk costs are not a part of the budget plan.
In the given scenario the delivery company has spent $3500 in order to upgrade the truck. So $3500 is treated as sunk cost in the proposed project.
