Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Because the injunction is the legal remedy that the special court's judge orders not the jury. The order enforce a party to do what must be done or refrains it from doing specific acts that harms the other party. So saying that Doorway sought the court injunction in which the jury decides the right course of action is incorrect because injunction is the warning of judge not of jury.
Answer:
C. sequential games.
Explanation:
Game theory is the learning of analytical types of mediation, ambivalence, and interaction between people, corporations, and governments. In-game theory, a sequential game means any game where an individual contestant picks their move before rest of the performers pick theirs. Importantly, the following performer's necessity has fascinating erudition regarding the first's selection, contrarily, the variation in period would have no strategic effect.
<span>An
opportunity cost of an investment is the difference between the return of an
investment taken and the return of another investment that one had not taken.
It is the forgone opportunity of an investment not taken or pursued. It is the
amount of money one could have made had one chosen to pursue the other
investment. </span>
Answer:
American Marketing Association
Explanation:
American Marketing Association -
It refers to the association of many marketing professionals all together , is referred to as the American Marketing Association .
In the year 2012 , there were 30,000 members , present in the United states .
Which consists of 250 collegiate chapters and 76 professional chapters .
Hence from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct option is American Marketing Association .
