Answer:
Finished goods = $85,800
Ending inventory = $5,280
Explanation:
beginning WIP 400 units
$11,080
8000 units started
$80,000
units finished and transferred out = 8,000 + 400 - 600 = 7,800
ending inventory 600 units
80% complete
equivalent units = 7,800 + (600 x 80%) = 8,280
total costs = $91,080
cost per equivalent unit = $91,080 / 8,280 = $11
Finished goods = 7,800 x $11 = $85,800
Ending inventory = 480 x $11 = $5,280
Answer:
$0.6 per unit
Explanation:
The computation of the variable rate per unit of output is shown below:
But before that first we have to determine the variable cost which is
= Total utilities cost - fixed cost
= $2,600 - $2,000
= $600
And the number of units produced is 1,000 units
So, the variable rate per unit of output for utilities cost is
= $600 ÷ 1,000 units
= $0.6 per unit
Answer:
a)equity
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about that how Harris Inc. is planning a large expansion and needs to raise new capital. If management thinks the firm’s stock is overvalued and its prospects are poor while investors are unaware of these opinions, In this case the management will want to raise capital using equity. In finance, equity can be regarded as when there is debts or liabilities associated to the ownership of assets .It can be visualize as the stake of shareholder in the firm which can be seen on balance sheet of the company .Equity is measured for accounting purposes by subtracting liabilities from the value of an asset. Equity can be calculated as substraction of total liabilities from total assets of the company , it's usefulness bid found in some key financial ratios like ROE.
Answer: Because they are hard and you definitely need something to show them that you know what you are doing especially in finance bc you are managing people’s money and could go to jail if you don't know the codes and laws and you could really hurt someone financially
Explanation:
Answer: Patton will sue QC industries for tortious interference with a contract
Explanation:
Since there has been a contract which had already been signed, then if QC industries damages Patton Company's image, Patton will sue QC industries for tortious interference with a contract.
Tortious interference, is also refered to as the intentional interference with a contract and this occurs when the business relationship or contract that one has with a third party is intentionally damaged by another person. In this case, QC intentionally damages Patton's contract and therefore, Patton will sue QC industries for tortious interference with a contract.
