Answer:
The answer is: A) A decrease in the price of paper used to make greeting cards.
Explanation:
In normal market conditions, an increase in the equilibrium quantity of greeting cards means that the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied of greetings cards increased. Usually an increase in the quantity supplied will result in an increase of the price of the good or service. But on this specific case something else made the price of the cards decrease. The only one of the four possible options that can explain an external cause for a decrease in the price of greetings cards, is a decrease in the price of paper used to manufacture them.
Answer:
C) ABC 5% and DEF 5.7%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Purchasing Cost of Stock ABC purchased = $40 per share
Purchasing Cost of Stock DEF purchased = $35 per share
Time = 6 months
Selling price of share of ABC = $42 per share
Selling price of DEF share = $36
Dividend paid to the DEF = $0.5 each quarter i.e $0.5 twice in 6 months
Thus,
Total dividend paid to DEF = $0.5 × 2
= $1
Now,
For ABC
Total return = Selling price - Purchasing Cost
= $42 - $40
= $2 per share
thus,
Holding period return = [ Total return ÷ Purchasing cost ] × 100%
= [ $2 ÷ $40 ] × 100%
= 5%
For DEF
Total return = Selling price + Dividend received - Purchasing Cost
= $36 + $1 - $35
= $2 per share
thus,
Holding period return = [ Total return ÷ Purchasing cost ] × 100%
= [ $2 ÷ $35 ] × 100%
= 5.7%
Hence,
option C) ABC 5% and DEF 5.7%.
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
Although goodwill is the difference between the consideration transferred by the acquirer to the acquiree it is not the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired rather it is the fair value of the net assets acquired.
The difference is fair value of identifiable assets is the value of the assets at some point of time which is expected to provide some future benefits.
The fair value of the net assets acquired is the total of the fair value of net assets minus liabilities.
Answer and Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the account payable beginning balance is $250,000 and the ending balance of the account payable is $350,000 so here $100,000 different would rise the cash from operations
Therefore the same is to be considered as there is an increase in inflows of cash
So the difference would be rise the cash from operations
Answer:
No, contracts for personal services are not assignable.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
Yes, as long as the assignment does not increases the burden on Max.
Yes, Claire can assign her obligations under the contract to anyone who accepts.
No, contracts for personal services are not assignable.
No, the assignment is not valid since Max did not give any consideration.
This is most likely not a good strategy for this woman. The fact that this woman has been hired as a freelance web designer means thta the woman is beig paid for her professional expertise. No one else can perform the job in the way that she can perform it. Therefore, she cannot assign this duty to another person.
