I can’t have no more food .......
Tinker v. Des Moines remain an important precedent-setting case because It established speech rights for students.
For better understanding let's explain what the statement mean
- Tinker v. Des Moines is a case that cannot be forgotten in history. It was a historic Supreme Court ruling in 1969 gave students' rights to free speech in public schools.
- In 1969, United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students. It agreed that students rights should be protected at all cost.
From the above we can therefore say that the answer Tinker v. Des Moines remain an important precedent-setting case because It established speech rights for students. is correct
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/19698413
Answer:
It's wrong.
Explanation:
In the Punnett square, we will use F to represent the dominant freckles gene and f to represent the recessive lack-of-freckles gene. The first individual would have FF, because homozygous means that both alleles are the same. The second individual would have Ff, because heterozygous means that it has 2 different alleles. If the first individual passes down one of its "F" alleles and the second individual passes down its "F" allele, the offspring would have 2 dominant alleles, and the researcher's conclusion is disproven.
