Enjoying poetry is probably not something that would
separate a person from broader culture because all people enjoy different
things. This would lead to the question,
then, “Why would all things separate people from each other?” If that were so, society would be separated
into tiny fragments based upon likes, which is not really the case when you
think about it. Within any group of
people, you will find each like different things—you will find artists who like
mountain climbing and those who don’t; you will find mountain climbers who like
knitting and those who don’t. If
anything, it would provide another element with which people could potentially
connect to another facet of the broader culture to which they belong. Because of that same rationale, the reading
of popular novels can definitely be seen to connect us. Additionally, even if some people liked a
popular novel and some people did not, they could have the opportunity to
connect in a conversation where they discussed their reasons for their
respective feelings for the novel. Thus,
literature of all types has a unifying element however small or insignificant
it may seem.
Answer:
chile i dont know i just need to answer a question so i can get more answers
Explanation:
blah blah bklahblagh bqiabdueabuifvews
An excerpt theorem that supports the idea that falling into a black hole is a violent death is that the tidal forces are so strong that they overcome the intermolecular forces of our organism.
It is very strong and will overcome intermolecular forces in vivo. This will tear our bodies in half. Then the halves split in half again, then split in half again... all that was left was a string of atoms descending toward the event horizon. This "stretching" effect due to tidal forces is known in pop science culture as "spaghettification".
With this information, we can conclude the excerpt theorems that support the idea that a fall into a black hole is a violent death and that tidal forces are so strong that they overcome the intermolecular forces of living organisms.
Learn more about the black hole at
brainly.com/question/10597324
#SPJ1
<span>The statement which best characterize these two passages is :One author is trying to persuade the reader to share a certain viewpoint, while the other is only concerned with giving information. The first passage is about the history of formation of the Yellowstone National Park, including the information why it is significant, which means that author appeals to readers' emotions, describing the park with great interest and passion. The second passage has no mood, just contains some facts and statistics.
</span>
Something that is argueable is debateable.
