Is there more to this? The wording is confusing
The discussion technique that Jennifer uses most clearly in this conversation is, challenging assumptions.
When we want to give a discussion a different approach, we use this technique through What if... questions, it is necessary to present another alternative to respond to things that we already established.
The other techniques are very different from this one, promoting participation would be mostly used by a moderator not a regular participant in the conversation, MAking an objective is to land the discussion into something real, and Asking for rhetorical questions does expect any kind of answer which we do have in here, therefore the other three options are incorrect.
Hello there!
When analyzing a story, which of the following is the best characteristic to examine would be <span>the development of characters. When you are reading a book, one thing that would really stand out to you, is actually getting to know the characters and to actually get to know them. So, when reading a book, you would want to see what the characters are like, and also the development of the characters. This would be something very important to analyze.
</span><span>a. the storyteller's performance
b. the author's educational background
c. the development of characters
d. the title of the work
Your correct answer would be the (third option).</span>
High because in the poles it snows and precipitation is high pressure system
All of them, which is 37 or 36, because they are all important to people, some have life lessons, and some are just entertaining. Plays were one of the things that made Shakespeare famous apart from poems or sonnets.
