A weakness of the British plan to move its forces from the southern colonies to the Caribbean was that the transportation of slaves would be risky and expensive.
Research are likely to suggest that competitive encounters are likely to be more hard working while the collaborative encounters are the ones who will likely give their time to cooperate. It is because competitive encounters are usually competitive in a way of reaching their tasks or goals while the collaborative encounters are likely to just cooperate because of their knowledge with the given task.
I believe the answer is: <span>arbitrary inference
</span><span>arbitrary inference refers to the process of creating a conclusion without sufficient evidences to back it up.
We can see this arbitary interference by observing marta's thought that believe Demerio is </span><span>older and losing my physical abilities without even seeing him doing the task.</span>
