Answer:
To support a high stock price, to support a bond or stock offering, or to increase the company's stock price.
Explanation:
The motivation to publish fraudulent financial statements varies depending on the situation. A common theme in many cases of fraud is the attempt to improve the reported financial information to maintain high stock prices, support bonds or stock quotes, or raise a company's stock price. In many companies that published fraudulent financial statements, senior executives held significant stocks or stock options, and lowering the price of the stock would significantly reduce personal net worth or make worthless options. As a result, senior management had to maintain the high share price and therefore needed high returns to maintain the high share price. Investors value reports that increase profits each year. Indeed, the decline in earnings can significantly lower a company's stock price. Sometimes fraudulent financial reports cause line managers to exaggerate the results to meet the company or other expectations. Sometimes the cost of failure in corporate governance is high, and when it comes to choosing between failure and fraud, some managers quickly turn to fraud.
Answer:
The correct answer is $2,500,000,000.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:
Operating capacity = 80%
Sales = $2 billion
Fixed assets = $600,000,000
So, we can calculate the level of sales by using following formula:
Level of sales = Sales ÷ operating capacity
= $2,000,000,000 ÷ 80%
= $2,500,000,000
Answer: 2.09
Explanation:
Given the following ;
Strike price (K) = $50
Price (c) = $6
Rate (r) = 6% = 0.06
Stock price (So) = $51
Time (T) = 1
Recall, relation for a put-call parity(p) is given by:
p + So = c + Ke^-(rT)
p = c + [Ke^-(rT)] - So
p = 6 + [50e^-(0.06 × 1)] - 51
p = 6 + [50×e^-0.06] - 51
p = 6 + (50 × 0.9417645) - 51
p = 6 + 47.0882267 - 51
p = 53.0882267 - 51
p = 2.0882267
p = 2.09
Answer:
Called the clients and cancelled jobs
Explanation:
If the plaintiff worked for the defendant and left to set up her own cleaning business, then she will most likely be bound by a non-compete clause.
So if she is saying she acted with the value of integrity, then she would called any of the defendant's clients and cancelled jobs in order to respect the non-compete clause.
However after sometime the non-compete clause is no longer binding.
