Answer:
President John F. Kennedy responded by calling for a meaningful civil rights bill in 1963, but his efforts were filibustered in the Senate. After his assassination that year, his successor Lyndon B. Johnson took up the cause. With the support of activists such as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Johnson was able to get a bill passed in the House and Senate in 1964.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act is not to be confused with the Civil Rights Act of 1991, which bolstered the earlier legislation by, among other provisions, allowing damages for victims of intentional employment discrimination.
<u>Answer:</u>
Canadian courts have shown an extraordinary receptiveness in receiving new standards from remote sources. Canadian culture has consistently supported itself as being tolerant and open to distant thoughts, and it would pursue that its legitimate foundations would need to hold onto this soul too. In an inexorably globalized reality where nearby law regularly interacts with foreign and worldwide law, courts have two alternatives.
One alternative is to move in and focus just on the national experience. The subsequent choice is to acknowledge the exchange of legitimate thoughts and the chances of transnational lawful talk promptly.
Splatter patterns from blood, things that seem to be missing, evidence of a break-in, disturbed areas on the walls, open, locked, and broken doors, evidence around the body.
Explanation:
To do a complete investigation the best way is to look for things that don't seem to be where they should be or are in a place that seems either unusual or different. Anything can be evidence depending on the case.
Answer:
B false
Explanation:
because if it was a professional robbee he would not have been caught before or have a prior arrest record