1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DENIUS [597]
2 years ago
9

Increased production due to mechanization. International competition causes drop in market prices. Increased debt causes loss of

farms. Which impact best completes the diagram? A Farmers move to cities for work B Government loans to farmers increase C Banks reduce interest rates on farm loans D Tariffs on foreign food commodities increase significantly
History
1 answer:
MrRissso [65]2 years ago
4 0

The impact that best completes the diagram on international competition and mechanization of American farms is D Tariffs on foreign food commodities increase significantly.

<h3>How did the U.S. respond to international competition in the 1920s?</h3>

When U.S. farms began producing more goods thanks to mechanization, they still came under intense international competition which led to a fall in prices.

This led to the U.S. government instituting tariffs on foreign food to help the farmers who were now in so much debt that many farms had been lost.

Find out more on U.S. tariffs on food commodities at brainly.com/question/3001855

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
This organization set standards for the field of medicine.
igor_vitrenko [27]
<span>The major organization that set standards for the field of medicine is referred to as the American Medical Association, although it should be noted that many such organizations have existed before.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Why do you think Stalin decided to form a pact with Hitler in August 1939?
anastassius [24]

On this day in 1939, Germany and the Soviet Union sign a non-aggression pact, stunning the world, given their diametrically opposed ideologies. But the dictators were, despite appearances, both playing to their own political needs.

After Nazi Germany’s invasion of Czechoslovakia, Britain had to decide to what extent it would intervene should Hitler continue German expansion. Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, at first indifferent to Hitler’s capture of the Sudetenland, the German-speaking area of Czechoslovakia, suddenly snapped to life when Poland became threatened. He made it plain that Britain would be obliged to come to the aid of Poland in the event of German invasion. But he wanted, and needed, an ally. The only power large enough to stop Hitler, and with a vested interest in doing so, was the Soviet Union. But Stalin was cool to Britain after its effort to create a political alliance with Britain and France against Germany had been rebuffed a year earlier. Plus, Poland’s leaders were less than thrilled with the prospect of Russia becoming its guardian; to them, it was simply occupation by another monstrous regime.

Hitler believed that Britain would never take him on alone, so he decided to swallow his fear and loathing of communism and cozy up to the Soviet dictator, thereby pulling the rug out from the British initiative. Both sides were extremely suspicious of the other, trying to discern ulterior motives. But Hitler was in a hurry; he knew if he was to invade Poland it had to be done quickly, before the West could create a unified front. Agreeing basically to carve up parts of Eastern Europe—and leave each other alone in the process—Hitler’s foreign minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, flew to Moscow and signed the non-aggression pact with his Soviet counterpart, V.M. Molotov (which is why the pact is often referred to as the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact). Supporters of bolshevism around the world had their heretofore romantic view of “international socialism” ruined; they were outraged that Stalin would enter into any kind of league with the fascist dictator.

But once Poland was German-occupied territory, the alliance would not last for long.

4 0
4 years ago
What is a current technology that you think will drastically change the world?
vekshin1

I think all these new iphones will change the world in the future.

3 0
3 years ago
The Battle of proved to be the single bloodiest day in American history.
yanalaym [24]
It was the The Battle of Antietam during the Civil War that was the bloodiest single day in American history--with he battle leaving roughly 23,000 men killed or wounded.
7 0
3 years ago
What link did Michael Harrington make between poverty and racism? a. He stated that ending racism would completely correct the p
scZoUnD [109]
<span>B. He noted that racism kept many minorities and ethnic groups in a state of poverty.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In a paragraph, explain how social and economic conditions for African Americans differed in the Upper South and the Deep South
    11·2 answers
  • How did Ralph Waldo Emerson Impact America society
    13·1 answer
  • • what were two dominant chinese exports during the ming period?
    13·1 answer
  • John Wycliffe and John Hus are important figures of the Protestant Reformation because
    7·1 answer
  • How were the west African kingdom involved with the slave trade?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of these colonies did not allow slavery at first, but changed its law as
    5·2 answers
  • What are the 3 formal qualifications necessary to become POTUS?
    14·1 answer
  • What created the demand that drove the transatlantic slave trade?
    9·2 answers
  • All of the following generally describe the Southern states during the mid 1800s EXCEPT:
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement best summarizes the significance of the Sunnah and Qur'an?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!