Answer:
Sometimes our justice system can really surprise us. How can a person sue another individual based on arguments that are known to be false? Shouldn't the courts just say no to this kind of lawsuits?
It's plain common sense that the court would dictate that the agreement should be annulled or rescinded based on the mother's fraud attempt or maybe mutual mistake between Michael Jordan and her. Even if they were both convinced that he was the father, after it was proven that he wasn't, the court shouldn't have even wasted its time (and taxpayers money) with this case.
Answer:
A promise to deliver a deed
Explanation:
The term, 'strict performance' is used to describe a contract between two parties. A contract is an agreement between two parties, and it is legally binding. When discharging contracts involving services, 'substantial performance' is required. For example, if I tell a painter to paint my house blue except for the kitchen and storeroom which should be painted white, and he does accordingly but failed in painting the kitchen white, he has performed substantially even though there was a minor breach. The consequences of which would be borne by him.
'Strict performance' is required in contracts where the terms are stated in express terms and the standards are very high. A 'deed' is such a contract because it is a document specifying the legal rights of a person or the ownership of a property. It requires the signatures of the two parties. Therefore, strict performance and adherence to the contractual deed are required.
A W-4 form is a short form you use when you don't have a lot of things to pay for. So when you get out of high school is an example to use it. so one of the entries is your paycheck amount, tax, and how much money you will or will not get
Is the question, what is the Annual Rate of Return?
P=A•e^rt
15=10•e^4r --> ln (e^4r) = ln (3/2)
4r = 0.4055
r = 0.1014
Answer:
Keep the cattle and recover the contract price from Esau
Explanation:
Since in the question it is given that the Double D Ranch and Esau enter into a contract on August 1 for selling of 200 cattle.
But Esau cancels the contract after 10 days. Now the Double D Ranch is not able to sell the cattle to the another buyer so in this case , the Double D Ranch should keep the cattle and get back the price of the contract from the another party i.e Esau as he cancels the contract
