Appeasement
During the 1930s, Britain and France followed a policy of
appeasement - they gave Hitler what he wanted in order to keep the peace. So
why did Britain and France keep on giving in to Hitler's demands. It was grounded
on the notion that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and, when his reasonable
demands had been fulfilled, he would stop.
A provisions of the Us neutrality act of 1935 : prohibited the sale of arms to any belligerent nations
The act of helping in weapon supply can be deemed as an act of favouritsm and couldn't be considered as neutral
Hope this helps!
Each branch<span> is restrained by the </span>other<span> two in several ways. For example, the president may veto a law passed by </span>Congress<span>. </span>Congress can<span> override that veto with a vote of two-thirds of both houses. </span>Another example is that the Supreme Court may check Congress<span> by declaring a law unconstitutional.</span>
Answer:
Gideon v. Wainwright made an enormous contribution to the so-called "due process revolution" going on in the Court led by Chief Justice Warren. Because of the ruling in this case, all indigent felony defendants--like many others charged with misdemeanors--have a right to court-appointed attorneys. Gideon undertook his own defense and was convicted. He was sentenced to five years in prison, where he crafted his own appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court by using prison writing materials and legal resources. The basis of his appeal was that his Sixth Amendment rights had been violated through the denial of counsel. the name of the Court case Argued January 15, 1963 Decided March 18, 1963 Full case name Clarence E. Gideon v. Louie L. Wainwright, Corrections Director. Decision: In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts. Following the decision, Gideon was given another trial with an appointed lawyer and was acquitted of the charges.Clarence Earl Gideon was a career criminal whose actions helped change the American legal system.
Explanation:
Source www.uscourts.gov
In the early 1900s, African Americans wanted to leave the south because of poor economic conditions (share cropping, etc) and racial discrimination. Slavery had just been abolished in 1865, so people hadn't quite accepted the idea of racial equality. It can be argued that we still haven't.
