A prejudiced person may not act on his thoughts although prejudice includes all affective, behavioural and cognitive components of an attitude. Whereas discrimination only involves behaviour.
So I'd say: prejudice is cognitive
And discrimination is behavioural
Hope that answer on right track
The answer is to have a war with japan
Question Options:
A) cause of action for breach of implied covenant of good faith.
B) retaliation claim as a result of whistleblowing activities.
C) legitimate claim under bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ).
D) disparate impact employment discrimination.
Answer: retaliation claim as a result of whistleblowing activities.
A retaliation claim involves an act whereby an employer treats an employee adversely when an employee alleges about any wrong, harassment or discrmination.
James was involved in whistleblowing which is the act whereby an individual passes information about a wrongdoing in an organisation. Based on this whistleblowing (reporting that particular batch of widgets did not meet the exacting requirements of the U.S) his boss demoted him( retaliation). Hence, James has a claim for retaliation.
I believe the answer is: <span>is usually intense
Desert is located in region with low elevation. The little to no rainfall that they get is happened because the flow of water that come to its way is blocked by objects (such as mountain) in higher elevation.
If, they had a rainfall, the water carrying cloud must be big enough to be blocked by mountains and yet still pass through, which resulted in intense rainfall.</span>
I am going to give you my honest opinion. I believe our country is still fighting against discrimination against today's immigrants because of the president we have. Immigration should not be restricted because without some of the immigrants we have here in America, we'd be limited in what we know and have achieved. Say for example, if Christopher Columbus never immigrated from England, he wouldn't have found the New Land of America (not to say that he founded this land in the first place but that's just a general example). Ultimately, if you were Hispanic, African, Asian, or even from Canada, you should still have access to a freer country such as America, where rules are lessened and given less strictness. That's my opinion, what's yours?