Answer:
156
Explanation:
78
× 2
multiply the 2 by 8 first
then multiply the 7 by 2
Answer:
A) The issuance of bonds on December 31, 2016.
Dr Cash 104,031
Cr Bonds payable 96,000
Cr Premium on bonds payable 8,031
B) The first interest payment on June 30, 2017.
Dr Interest expense 3,517
Dr Premium on bonds payable 803
Cr Cash 4,320
C) The second interest payment on December 31, 2017.
Dr Interest expense 3,517
Dr Premium on bonds payable 803
Cr Cash 4,320
Answer:
Taking his RMD in form of shares in a depressed market is a good investment decision. As the price will bound back and he will make more money.
Explanation:
When a traditional IRA holder gets to the age of 72 years he is entitled to required minimum distribution payments. This is not obtainable with other IRA plans.
RMD can be taken as cash or as shares. There is not tax difference between the two options.
Normally cash is better since it is easier to get access to and the beneficiary gets the exact dollar amount.
However when there is a depressed stock market, taking RMD in shares is a better option. Shares are bought and sold when prices appreciate.
This is a better option than selling shares at the low market price.
Answer:
Huron Investments issues $1 million in 13.250% bonds maturing August 11, 2028. The bond is callable August 11, 2023 at a call premium of 2.500%. August 11, 2023 the prevailing yield is 5.250%. If Huron Investments calls the entire issue and replaces it with 5.250% bonds also maturing August 11, 2028 then each semi-annual coupon payment will decrease by <u>$125,000</u>
Explanation:
Change in semi-annual coupon = (13% - 6.75%) x 4m / 2 = $125,000
Answer:
The battle of who should hold more power, the national government or the states, is perhaps the most seasoned battle in American history. Many believe that the states should hold more control over the national government, yet I differ sometimes. In the present society we have progressing banters about numerous points that worry general society. One of the huge issues that gets talked about frequently is whether maryjane ought to be authorized or not. I am fair with regards to this specific point, yet I do have a solid feeling on who ought to choose. At this moment, there are a few states around the nation that have authorized it, however the National government has not. This makes things incredibly confounding most definitely. The other concern I have is with the detained populace because of cannabis infringement. I think that its unjustifiable that there are individuals getting detainment charges for accomplishing something that another resident in a neighboring state is openly doing. I comprehend that individuals are worried about the possibility that that on the off chance that we permit the national government to settle on choices like this, at that point they will develop to be excessively ground-breaking, however I differ right now. There are measures set up to adjust the forces of the government, and we should confide in what the organizers had as a top priority when they drafted the constitution. At the point when they made the constitution, they gave the central government all the forces they figured they ought to have Article 1 area 8. They did this with the aim that they would shield the central government from getting excessively huge. The originators were clever people however, and they realized that the issues written in 1787 would not be the main ones to cross the ways of the American individuals. Considering this they included the "essential and legitimate statement", which was added to guarantee they could manage issues that emerged later on.
