Scientific ideas from the scientific revolution and political ideas from the enlightenment led to a period of social upheaval and b) violent change
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
A Functional Sociologists views a formal social structure like the
Indian Caste System as a system that had a purpose in that time, as part of the social, economic, and political presence in India.
Functionalists sociologists believe that all the norms, institutions, and rules in society serve a particular purpose. In this case, all the parts of the system had to work together, in harmony, to provide the results needed.
Let´s remember that the Caste System was very rigid in India, and people had no chances to change their status. In a caste system such as the implemented in India, people could have specific talents but they could not develop them. They were assigned tasks that had to be done all his life.
Answer:
Philadelphia is like ancient Sumer is discussed below in details.
Explanation:
- Before we talk about why Philadelphia is known as ancient Sumer we need to know what is Sumer.
- Sumer was an ancient civilization established in the Mesopotamia area of the Fertile land located between the Euphrates and Tigris rivers.
- It is famous for its variations in language, governance, structure, and more, Sumerians are acknowledged as the inventors of civilization as modern humans.
- Now, Philadelphia is known as ancient Sumer because same as Sumerian cities, Ancient Philadelphia cities were built mostly of mud bricks, with walls for defense.
What Marie should primarily consider if she decides to purchase a car of not using rational decision making is the marginal benefits and costs of her decision. So if she is thinking of buying of car, she should consider how much she would spend and what would be the benefits she can get in having a car.
Answer:
We must evaluate the performance of a candidate in a debate through the relevance and construction of his arguments and his oratory capacity.
Explanation:
The debate is a way of finding out about a certain topic, through the ability of two or more individuals to argue and speak.
With this, we can affirm that the best way to evaluate the performance of a candidate in a debate is through the construction of arguments and the supporting evidence, assessing whether the candidate presents relevant, true and proven information to build an effective argument. The oratorical capacity of the candidate is also important. This must always be calm, integral, fluent and with a good diction.
