C) market economy
Hope this helps
Here is information for both perspectives:
Federalists
I would support the federalists because they believed in a strong central government that would help to unite the states. Along with this, the creation of a new stronger federal government would help to solve the problems America faced under its first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not tax or even raise an army. With the new US Constitution, the federal government would have these necessary powers in order to ensure safety within American society.
Anti-Federalists
I would support the Anti-Federalists because they were advocates of states rights. Along with this, the Anti-Federalists knew that a central government with too much power could very easily result in a monarchy, much like the one the United States experienced when controlled by Great Britain.
Answer:
Uncertain - 99%.
Explanation:
Predicting or forecasting the future could be measured with a sense of certainty or uncertainty. If a person sees dark clouds on the sky, they would be more certain than uncertain that it's an omen of rain. If you are collecting relevant data and then apply it to a forecast having less than 1% of certainty of reducing the degree of risk, conditions are uncertain. And, if measured from 1% to 100%, substracting that 1% of certainty leaves a 99& of uncertainty.
In the 2012 presidential election, Latino Support for Mitt Romney was overestimated.
Mitt Romney hoped that he would get a considerable amount of Latino's support due to his lineage. But The majority of Latino's vote were Given to Barrack Obama instead.