1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PIT_PIT [208]
1 year ago
7

What was the significance of the Prophet being given the revelation by word rather than in writing? (4)

History
1 answer:
Scrat [10]1 year ago
8 0

Answer:

The Prophet received revelations verbally rather than in writing. It is significant in many ways. The Prophet could not read or write. Therefore if the revelations had come in writing, he could not read it. When it was coming in words, the Prophet could understand it and he could also remember it. When we have something in writing, we do not need to rember it by heart but when we hear something and we need to remember it, then we put effort to remember it. It was also not easy for the Prophet to keep the record in writing. Quran is a huge book and it was not easy to maintain writing in a proper order. Since Muslims remembered the entire Quran by heart, it was easy to read it and remember it. Since Mohammad (sw) was not formally literate, the pagans could blame him easily that the Quran was written by someone else and it was not the word of God.

Quran came to the Prophet on different situations and events which the Prophet encountered both in Makkah and Madina. In writing, it would have been very difficult to relate these events with revelations. In words, it was much easier to convey the message to the other people.

If this answer helped you, give this answer a heart, rate it and if you could then please mark it brainliest. Thanks!

You might be interested in
What best defines mass production?
frez [133]

Answer:

the making of natural resources

machines increase the production of cloth

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does whitman in specimen days tell the reader that he was coming out of an opera when he heard the news of the war a: to sho
ElenaW [278]

Answer:

c: to give his personal experience

Explanation:

"Specimen Days" presents a type of biography of the poet Whitman, focusing on the life of the poem during the American civil war and how he dealt with this period and with the later period.

This book seeks to mix historical events in the country with Whitman's life and personal experiences during those events. For this reason, when the book states that the poet was leaving an opera when he heard the news of the war, the book seeks to present a personal experience of his life.

3 0
3 years ago
Which best describes why some people, such as James Madison, thought the Bill of Rights was necessary? Rights that were not list
Zolol [24]

Answer:

Option: Rights that were not listed would be unprotected.

Explanation:

The Bill of Rights introduced to protect the citizens of America by the Congress in 1791 as they approved and ensuring rights which include the freedoms of religion, speech, press, and assembly with restricting the power of the government. For the first time, James Madison proposed the U.S. Bill of Rights because he thought that not listed rights will remain unprotected and misused by the government in future.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Americans often pride themselves that theirs is a land of opportunity. how much economic opportunity truly did exist in colonial
ryzh [129]
Not to much if you take into account the factors of underdeveloped economy at the time, trade was a means of living, and the classes standings played a role in where you stood in a economy  
6 0
3 years ago
How were the sophists different from the other philosophers of ancient greece? explain ur answer
lilavasa [31]

Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.

Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.

Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal,  regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.

Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract,  out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.

In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hello its me again! who is the assumed speaker? in Annabel Lee
    14·1 answer
  • Which phrase from the paragraph best supports the central idea that The Holocaust
    13·1 answer
  • Identify whether the following features belong to the Tang dynasty or the Song dynasty.
    6·1 answer
  • How can people, individually or in association with others, bring their influence to bear on government in ways other than votin
    14·1 answer
  • How did people in the Middle colonies make money?
    15·1 answer
  • Who is the primary writer of the Constitution? Who is known as the father of the Constitution? *
    14·1 answer
  • King was the oldest man to win the Nobel Peace Prize True or False
    13·2 answers
  • Simon bolivar was known as the liberator because he liberated
    8·2 answers
  • What is the contribution of Pigafetta's chronicle in Philippine history?
    9·2 answers
  • How did hitler both gain and maintain power in Germany?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!