1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
2 years ago
6

Is there a possible connection between document C and document B?​

History
1 answer:
dlinn [17]2 years ago
5 0

The documents C and B may indeed be related to one another. So many invasions occurred. Another connection is that the soldiers abandoned their defense, which meant that they would not be able to repel the invaders.

  • There is a correlation because losing protection would make it harder for the soldiers to defeat the invaders if there were several invasions.
  • It's conceivable that Documents C and B are related because Document B claimed that because the soldiers were helpless and surrendered, fled and rendered their army hopeless, the adversaries would seize control and a populace invasion would fill the void. As a result, Document B serves as both a justification for Rome's demise and evidence in Document C, which also depicts the invasion.
  • The two documents are related to one another. They are related since they both involve the military. The reasons why the military disintegrated are discussed in document B. The invasion of Rome by the six tribes is discussed in document C. If the army hadn't disintegrated, the tribes wouldn't have been able to attack.
  • This is due to the fact that documents B and C describe Rome's decline as a result of the invaders. It is explained in document B how the troops weakened themselves, and it is shown in document C together with a map of the empires that invaded Rome. My proof is found in B, where it states, "But when, due to carelessness and sloth, round drills were abandoned. This proof demonstrates the soldiers' slackness. Rome's invasions are depicted in C with lines, names, and dates. This proof provided me with the solution.
  • Given that they both compare how Rome's army declined, Document C and Document B may be related to one another. I discovered this information by looking through Doc B's search results and then observing how many different nations had attacked Doc C. When these sources discuss how many different nations Rome's soldiers faced without armor, they are compared.

To learn more about document C and document B visit:brainly.com/question/27215505

#SPJ9

You might be interested in
Do you think history has any relevance to events in the world today? Explain why or why not.
Reptile [31]

of course it does many things in history caused how we are now, such as ww1 without it there would be no ww2 or no cold war ww1 was a big turning point in history cause it set out the rest of the 20th century

4 0
3 years ago
How did the Muslim Empires and institutions help different regions of Afroeurasia become more interconnected
Mariulka [41]

since the Ottoman Empire controlled the Bosporus Strait and had a strong economy, they helped interconnect Afroeurasia. the place was also a center of Islam, which attracted people from different parts of the world to the city of Istanbul.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the changes in English government is reflected in the government of the United States today?
Mice21 [21]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the "implementation of the English Bill of Rights," since this put "checks" on the monarchy especially when it came to taxation. </span></span>
3 0
4 years ago
why do you think the Sherman Antitrust Act and other attempts at regulating monopolies and trusts were not effective?
Vesna [10]
For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully, chiefly because of narrow judicial interpretations of what constitutes trade or commerce among states. When it was first passed, the Sherman Antitrust Act was largely ineffective at stopping industrial monopolies. Courts at the time tended to hold a very narrow view of what constituted “trade or commerce among states,” and most companies were not held liable under the act. For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Antitrust Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully. Ironically, its only effective use for a number of years was against labor unions, which were held by the courts to be illegal combinations.
6 0
3 years ago
What is the growing season like in the middle Atlantic states
o-na [289]
In New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania were under snow cover in that season
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ________ was largely responsible for getting a series of constitutional amendment proposals passed in the u.s. house of represen
    10·1 answer
  • Rules of behavior known as the Ten Commandments were derived from what tradition
    15·1 answer
  • Are the hitties and kassites the same
    12·1 answer
  • HEY GUYS CAN YOU GUYS WRITE EVERYTHING YOU KNOW FROM THIS INFORMATION PLUS EVERYTHING YOU THINK THESE ARTIFACTS MEAN ABOUT THE C
    15·1 answer
  • What guide did the colonists use to run the country during the american revolution
    11·1 answer
  • how the Catholic Church reacted to the Protestant Reformation by describing the major events of the Counter Reformation in detai
    7·1 answer
  • Why is life important?
    8·2 answers
  • Can some body help ASAP brain list to who every gives right answer
    13·1 answer
  • The Wealthy Elite made up what per cent of the population in 1871?
    7·1 answer
  • The middle class was affected by the Industrial Revolution in which of the following ways?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!