Answer:
<u></u>
Explanation:
If<em> the investment yield 6% per year</em>, each year its value is multiplied by 1.06.
After 2 years, the value is multiplied by 1.06², after 3 years it is multiplied by 1.06³, and so on.
After n years, the value is multiplied by 1.06ⁿ.
You want that <em>the investment quadruples</em>, thus the multiplicative factor is 4, meaning that you want to solve for:
If you do not know logarithms, you can solve by succesive iterations:
- 1.06² = 1.1236
- 1.06⁴ = 1.2625
- 1.06¹⁰ = 1.79
- 1.06²⁰ = 3.2
- 1.06³⁰ = 5.7
- 1.06²⁵ = 4.29
- 1.06²⁴ = 4.05
- 1.06²³ = 3.82
Thus, <em>if an investement yields 6% per years</em>, it takes 24 years t<em>he investment to quadruple in value.</em>
If you know logarithms, you can make n the subject of the equation:
Again, the solution is 24 years.
Answer:
c. The moral minimum theory
Explanation:
The moral minimum theory is a principle that statutes that a business should do <em>NO intentional harm or do the minimum harm possible in order to consider its behavior the minimum required for ethical behavior.</em>
I hope you find this information useful and interesting! Good luck!
In the cash flow statement financing activities refer to the flow of cash between a business and its owners and creditors.
Answer: discharged by performance
Explanation:
When parties to a contract are discharged from their duties as per the contract, it means that they are no longer party to the agreement. When this is done by performance, it means that the discharge was done because both parties have fulfilled the demands of the contract.
Bob agreed to tutor Lola for two hours and Lola agreed to pay Bob $50 for that. Bob then tutored her for the two hours and was paid the amount. The parties have therefore fulfilled their obligations to each other and so the contract has been satisfied.
Answer: True
Explanation: The given case does illustrates business acquisition. Business acquisition refers to the process in which one company purchases majority or all of the shares of another company.
In the given case, Laurie corp. purchased Smith inc. and the part of production is then transferred to the purchased company for the ease of operations.
Hence, from the above we can conclude that the answer is true.
