Answer:
Kindly go through the Explanation.
Explanation:
While responding back Tech Performance who would be referred as a defendant in this occasion may opt for two of the response:
1. Tech Performance to file an answer & defend
The answer filed should include admit of statements and the allegations put across by Uno IT or to simply deny them & set defenses from the defendants part. As by any chance if defendant admits to the allegations filed by UNO computer systems, the judgment will surely be in favor of UNO computer systems. But if defendant denies the allegations then the matter would proceed further as per the guidelines of the federal court, which will give enough time to Tech performance to be prepared with their set of defense statement.
Hence While filing the answers the defendant may file an affirmative defense according to which the defendant will agree to the truth of the complaint but would raise new facts in order to confront that the defendant firm should not be held responsible/ liable for the damage sustained by UNO. The defendant could also deny Uno IT’s allegations and assert a counterclaim stating and proving that the reason of the crash occurred causing loss was due to certain actions from UNO It’s end. Also it may also allege Uno IT for the damage done to the reputation of the Tech Performance.
2. Tech Performance to file a motion to dismiss instead of an answer
The defendant may file a motion to dismiss stating that the motion might contend that even if the facts presented in the complaint are true, their legal consequences such as there is no reason to go ahead with the suit. Other section for this motion includes improper service of process and the court’s lack of jurisdiction. In this case of filing a motion, if the motion is denied the defendant will be given time to file an answer and if its granted, Uno IT will be given time to file an amended complaint.
Answer:
Yes I can tell whether or not the person is friendly or not
Explanation:
The first thing is that friendly conversation companion is the one who will be available for you to talk and answers you with logics and is more kind.
If I called a person in my past and my experience was that he answered me in an ethical manner, without any hesitation and talks to me freely about the matters and considerations involved with the topic then the person is friendly. Furthermore, the time you are calling him or her and the situation he or she is in sometime have effect on the conversation. If I have done wrong to someone then greater chances exist that the person will not be friendly and vice versa.
The potential risks that these three groups fall into the same category is that it is a low percentage and it is not a realistic proposition.
According to the theory of 50, 20, 30, a person's salary should be divided into 3 buckets that are:
- 50% of salary must go towards mandatory expenses (housing rent payments, utilities, medical care, basic food, and transportation).
- 20% of the salary must be used for savings and debt payments (programmed savings for old age or a special event, or the payment of debts such as card payments, bank loans, among others).
- 30% of the salary must be allocated for non-priority expenses (it is the expenditure of money on experiences, objects, or others that are not essential for the individual).
This income distribution is unrealistic because most people spend more than 50% of their salary on compulsory expenses, reducing their economic capacity for other purposes.
In this way, the 20% destined to savings and payment of debts would be a minimum amount of the salary, which could have serious consequences such as:
- Inability to pay debts
- Inability to save for the future
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/12198015
Answer:
Revaluation of assets and liabilities
Explanation:
The main adjustments required at the time of a partner from a partnership firm: Change in the profit sharing ratio. Accounting treatment of goodwill.
When someone like Kelsie blames Steve for all her shortcomings at work even though he is the hardest working member on the team, it is an example of political workplace deviance. Therefore, the option B holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of workplace deviance?</h3>
Workplace deviance can be referred to or considered as the tendency of an employee or a member of an organization to intentionally cause a sense of harm to the regular functioning of the organization.
A political deviance is a type of workplace deviance wherein an employee in higher authority starts blaming others for slightest of irregularities in the team.
Therefore, the option B holds true and states regarding the significance of workplace deviance.
Learn more about workplace deviance here:
brainly.com/question/28538100
#SPJ1
The missing options to the question are added below for better reference.
A. group deviance
B. political deviance
C. personal aggression deviance
D. property deviance
