What are 2 tools you can use to identify possible issues in a QuickBooks Online Company?

Wizard Co. purchased two machines for $250,000 each on January 2, 2005.

Vikki [24]

Answer:

B. $275,000

Explanation:

The second machine will be depreciate over time as it can later be used for operational purposes or another research projects. The first, as can only be used for a research project It should be considered expenses for the entire amount regardless of the useful life.

Machine B useful life 10 years

depreciation expense: cost / useful life

250,000 / 10 = 25,000

machine A 250,000 + 25,000 depreciation for machine B = 275,000 total

7 0

3 years ago

Gardner electric has a beta of 0.88 and an expected dividend growth rate of 4.00% per year. the t-bill rate is 4.00%, and the t-

coldgirl [10]

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

8 0

3 years ago

The 20% off sale is a better deal than the $200 rebate or $150 coupon for the $1,500 dining set. The Porters budgeted $1,250 for

vovikov84 [41]

Answer:20% off is better and it is the only offer which is under the budget.

Explanation:Given,

The original cost of the dining set = $ 1,500,

If there is a off of 20%,

Then the discount on dinning table = 20% of 1500

= $ 300

So, the final amount of the dinning table after 20% off = 1500 - 300 = 1200 < 1250

Thus, it under the budget.

Now, in $ 200 rebate,

The new cost of the dinning table = 1500 - 200 = $ 1300 > 1250,

Thus, it is not under budget.

While, In $150 coupon,

The new cost of the dinning table = 1500 - 150 = $ 1350 > 1250,

Thus, it is not under budget.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A company has 360,000 shares authorized, 200,000 shares issued, and 100,000 shares outstanding. The balance in its Common Stock

Alona [7]

Answer:

$1 par value

Explanation:

The computation of the par value of the stock after the split is given below:

= $200,000 ÷ (100,000 × 2 )

= $200,000 ÷ 200,000

= $1 par value

Hence, the par value of its stock after the split is $1 par value

We simply divide the balance by the number of outsanding shares so that the par value could come

5 0

3 years ago

Mr. Dealer bought a fleet of SUVs (sport utility vehicles) from General Motors (GM) on credit, GM agreeing not to assign the res

Temka [501]

Answer:

Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.

If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.

3 0

3 years ago