Answer:
the answer is less is more
Answer:
The answer is: What would happen if no cotton was furnished for three years? I will not stop to depict what every one can imagine, but this is certain: England would topple headlong and carry the whole civilized world with her, save the South.
Explanation:
Firstly, we have the main idea and topic in this passage is “Cotton” and “war”, also we can call them main words, as thanks to them, they give us a prompt as to what is the passage about. So these lines written in the answer space, are the main argument, because it mentions in different words what might happen if no cotton was provided during a period of time and also explains with solid arguments why.
a.swimming is exercise
b.cooking is work
c.studying is boring
d.watching television is fun
e.walking is time pass
f.screaming is fun and anger too
g.painting is expressing
h.laughing is releasing stress
don't write this in answer u will get 0 if u write this
I would have the church join together and say a pray i also do my best to help this child who is being bullied by finding out who bullied the child or children and I would put a stop to it by reporting to the parents and whoever is in charge once this happening i would also make a group and protest about why you should not bully and ways to stop it
PLEASE MAKE THIS ANSWER THE BRANLIEST IF THIS ANSWER HAS HELPED YOU
In what ways is Thoreau's essay based on the concepts of individualism and self- reliance?
Thoreau combines his arguments about why people should practice civil disobedience with personal anecdotes and discussions specific to his own time and place. Is this a rhetorically useful approach? Why or why not?
