Married women could not own property.
It was not until the 1900s that every state had given property rights to married women. Property rights started in New York when an Act was officially passed on April 7, 1848 for effectual protection of the property of married women. This modeled for other states to follow.
<u>Identity Theft</u> occurs when criminals obtain personal information that allows them to impersonate someone else in order to use the person's credit to obtain financial accounts and make purchases.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Theft is an action of committing crime. Theft is also defined as taking someone’s property or things without their permission or knowledge.
<u>Identity theft</u> means stealing someone’s identity and using them to gain financial advantage. Identity theft can happen in many ways. Some of them are committing theft on financial identity, medical identity, insurance identity, driver’s license and social security identity. Identity theft can be reported to federal trade commission.
Answer:
Inadmissible, because prior bad acts cannot be admitted to prove the defendant's propensity to commit the specific crime with which he is charged
Explanation:
Evidence
This is refered to as a group or a collective mass of things such as testimony and exhibits etc.
Trier of law helps to know what laws apply to the case, decides on what evidence is admissible, reviews written briefs submitted by both sides, gives legal points and authories relevant to the decision etc.
The role of prosecutor
They are responsible for filing of charges, trials, and appeals, review the actions of police officers, make judgements on whether they were appropriate etc.
The role of defense is responsible for trial strategy.
The evidence is admissible in court are only important evidence related to its admissible in court. In some few cases, relevant evidence will not be admitted in court.
A relevant evidence is inadmissible if it one is when the evidence found is in violation of the defendants constitutional rights or violations of the hearsay rule that state that information is opportuned.etc.
First of all, there is no reason to charge the wife - she is not doing anything wrong.
Also, it would not be a homicide, unless he kills his wife.
It is also not negligence, since he is actively abusing her.
So the correct answer is:
a. When the husband is charged, the case would be a criminal case.
