Answer:
The correct answers are $40,000 and $13,500
Explanation:
The implicit cost of the business is $40,000 nothing for the entrepreneur's time plus $13,500 nothing for the entrepreneur's funds (enter your response as an integer)
The implicit cost indicates the cost of an asset rather than selling it or renting it out. In other words, the company has to give up by deciding not to exploit an asset. For this case $40,000
For the other line
15% = 0.15
$90,000 x 15% = $13,500
The answer is amplification. This occurs when
your product is shared, either over organic or compensated commitment,
within social marketing networks thus accumulating your
word-of-mouth publicity. Amplification carry out by assimilating
your message endorsed (amplified) over and done with workers, clienteles,
business partners, admirers and influencers.
Answer:
A. Start by using the = in the cell where you wish to put the information.
Explanation:
Click the cell you want to place the information, then enter the " = " sign in it. Move the cursor to the sheet from which you want to retrieve information and click the cell with the information you want to retrieve. Automatically excel displays that information on the first sheet.
Answer:
12%
Explanation:
For computing the equity cost of capital first we have to determine the weight of the capital structure after that the WACC and then finally equity cost of capital which is shown below:
Weight of capital structure
For debt
= $200 million ÷ $400 million
= 0.50
For equity
= 50 million × $4 ÷ $400 million
= 0.50
Now the WACC is
= 0.50 11% + 0.50 × 5%
= 8%
Since the value fo equity is declined by
= 50 × $3
= $150
Now the equity cost of capital is
= WACC + (WACC - interest rate) × (debt ÷ equity)
= 8% + (8% - 5%) × (200 ÷ 150)
= 12%
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question which, Darren was eligible to assist to a traditional of 401,000 in 2019, but we were told he forgot and later he paid in 15, June 2020, he is look as though he paid in 2019 because and it is true.
The reason why the answer is true is that Darren is that the time he paid the money in July 15, 2020, it was still within the time he allowed to still pay for the year 2019, that's why he considered as though he paid in 2019.
