$2712000 are the creditors’ claims on their assets.
The given assets = $4393000, common stock = $1077000, retained earnings = $604000, creditor's = ?
libilities = assets
creditors + common stock + retained earnings = assets
creditors + $1077000 + $604000 = $4393000
creditors + $1681000 = $4393000
creditors = $4393000 - $1681000
creditors = $2712000
Hence, creditors' claim on their assets is $2712000.
Still, a car is an assets if it's cheaper than what you paid for it because it's readily available on the market and can be turned into cash. That alone, by definition, makes it an asset. It's these additional costs and constant depreciation that make a car worthless.
Learn more about assets at
brainly.com/question/25821437
#SPJ4
Explanation:
Let’s explore one by one as proposed:
An oil cartel raises oil prices: all prices in the oil-related products will increase making it more expensive for companies to be able to afford employees. As the US economy is heavily based on oil import and consumption, the unemployment rate (let´s call it UR from now on) would increase. Countries that export more than import could benefit from this scenario.
The U.S. dollar gains value against foreign currencies: It would be more expensive to produce goods in the US as its currency becomes stronger. Hence companies could choose to produce overseas, increasing the UR. One of the factors that attract investments is a cheap currency, meaning that a company could operate there at lower costs than anywhere else.
American consumers expect higher income in the future: As fights about average salary would arise between employees and companies, igniting even sindicalization, its proper to think that the same as above could occur; companies could choose to produce overseas in countries less demanding of labor rights and income, such as China provinces (I would recommend for you to watch American Factory, a awarded Netflix documentary about that subject).
Brazil experiences economic growth and increases its demand for U.S. exports: as I said in the first alternative, a country that has increased or more expensive exports could benefit from that creating more jobs, in this case decreasing the UR. If Brazil demands more US products, more has to be produced by the country, which would mean more people employed in this attractive sector.
U.S. real estate values rise: to be honest, it only affects indirectly. As housing becomes more expensive, people have to work more to be able to afford housing. That would mean they seeking better-paying jobs or in the absence of those being homeless of at least unable to buy a home. We could argue that the UR would decrease because it becomes more expensive to afford housing and hence people would migrate more but that’s a long shot rationale.
C, tv commercials are ussualy the most expensive.
If that helps make sure to mark this as the brainliest!
-procklown <3
Monopoly is a seller<span> that is selling a unique product in the market and in a </span>monopoly<span> market, the seller faces no competition. </span>
A firm that is a monopoly can ignore the actions of other firms. From the given option the following best describes monopoly:
<span>C: A monopoly is a firm that is the only seller of a product in a given industry.</span>
Answer:
along a track in the same direction.
Explanation:
According to the law of supply, the price of the goods increases with an increase in the quantity of the goods supplied. Similarly, the price of the goods decreases with a decrease in the quantity of the goods supplied. This means that the price and quantity are directly proportional to each other. The price and quantity will move along a track in the same direction respectively.
