Answer:
B. marginal cost curve, but only the portion above the minimum of average total cost.
Explanation:
- A competitive firms short-run supply curve is a segment of the marginal cost and lies above the average variable costs and if a short run firm decides to shut down its prices of the goods is less than the average variable costs of production.
Answer:
1. $3375
$3375
2. $4347
$3456
3 $7300
$5475
Explanation:
Straight line depreciation expense = (Cost of asset - Salvage value) / useful life
( $29,200 - $2,200,) / 8 = $3375
depreciation expense each year is $3375
Depreciation expense using the double declining method = Depreciation factor x cost of the asset
Depreciation factor = 2 x (1/useful life) = 2/8 = 0.25
2020 = 0.25 x 29200 = 7300
2021 = 0.25x( 29200 - 7300)
Activity method based on output = (output produced that year / total output of the machine) x (Cost of asset - Salvage value)
Answer: creeping featurism
Explanation: Creeping featurism is a slang used for the term feature creep. It refers to the problem faced by the consumers due to continuous addition of features in an existing product. These addition make the product more complex and hard to use for the users.
In the given case, some customers of mobile phone have a belief that the new features added to the phones have made it complex and less reliable.
Thus, we can conclude that the given case is an example of creeping featurism.
Answer:
40%
Explanation:
The four firm concentration ratio calculates the concentration ratio of the 4 largest firms in an industry.
Four firm concentration ratio = 0.2 + 0.1 + 0.07 + 0.03 = 0.4 = 40%
Answer:
The following are 3 against reasons for the reconstruction of Greensburg as the "green city":
Explanation:
Following are the reasons and the counter reasons:
Reasons:
- Its tornado was something which will never be large as ever before, in which the city has been harmed and 95% of his residences have been destroyed. It also offers you to recreate the green city.
- The creation of a green city would also enable many cities to the devastated area to integrate with green technology.
- The Greenburg would become an icon with style as well as a prototype for the building of a clean energy city.
Counter Reason:
- The green tech isn't cheap and it would put pressure on the public resources.
- When a tornado of the same size hit Greenburg, then nobody would cause a serious source of financial and private assets.
- The city should give priority to tornado refugee camps that are capable of protecting public goods instead of building a green culture.
