An instance where sellers should work to keep relationships with consumers is when they feel that the product
Answer:
26.66 or 27%
Explanation:
The computation of the margin of safety percentage is shown below:
Margin of Safety
= 100 - Break Even %
= 100 - 73.33
= 26.66 or 27%
Working Note
Sales (3,000 units) $60,000
Less: Variable expenses -$42,000
Contribution margin -$18,000
CM Ratio (A) 30.00%
Fixed expenses (B) 13,200
Break Even Point C = B ÷ A 44,000
Break Even % of Total Sale 73.33%
Answer: Positioning strategy
Explanation: In simple words it refers to a marketing strategy under which an organisation tries to spotlight specific areas of operations and qualities in the eyes of customers that they have better in comparison to their competitors.
In the given case, The food brewery is offering its product in a different way than the other participants and is trying their best to highlight that quality.
Thus, we can conclude that they are using positioning strategy.
Answer:
A. Time series
B. Cross Sectional
C. Panel
D. Cross Sectional
Explanation:
(a) Quarterly data on the level of U.S. new housing construction from 2000 to 2018, Time series data, numerical
(b) Data on number of doctor visits in 2018 for a sample of 192 individuals. Cross sectional data, numerical
(c) Data on annual health expenditures for each U.S. state from 2000 to 2018. Panel Data, Numerical
(d) Data on usual mode of transportation used to commute to work for a sample of 151 individuals. Categorical
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.