Answer:
$7,000 gift will be worth $19,922 after 17 years ( or 68 quarters) given the discount rate is 6.2% compounded quarterly.
Explanation:
The worth of $7,000 nowadays after 17 years is equal to its future value compounded for the time of 17 years or 68 quarters.
As the discounted rate is 6.2% compounded quarterly, we have:
Compounding period = 17 x 4 = 68; Interest rate = 6.2%/4 = 1.55%.
Apply the formula for future value to determine the value of $7,000 in 17 years as: 7,000 x (1+1.55%) ^68 = $19,922.
Thus, the answer is $19,922.
Answer:
A) Can I access information electronically to speed up the research process?
C) What strategies should I use when looking up information in the library database?
D) What does the receiver need to know about this topic?
Explanation:
To determine what and how a research should be conducted, several factors ought to be considered. Some of the factors of consideration include these listed below.
- Before setting out to to conduct a research, it is vital that the researcher understands the position of the receiver on the subject matter. This implies having an accurate understanding of what the receiver already knows about the subject matter. This would inform what further information needs to be added during the research.
- It is also important to have a good strategy for getting information in the library database as literary sources are segmented in libraries. Therefore, it would be unwise to obtain information randomly.
- Electronic platforms like the internet are also a good source of information which would be helpful if incorporated in the research process.
I believe that you forgot the options, but i think i know them.
So, one of then is that it employed more workers: true they did bring it. Another option is that they brought lower prices: true as well
another option is that they brought better quality products, and this is also sometimes true.
<span>
The correct answer is : monopolies, which in any case would not be an advantage for the consumer.
</span>
He may be liable for<u> "damages, fines, or imprisonment."</u>
Copyright law does not contain any proviso that enables unapproved gatherings to make individual duplicates of copyrighted items. Be that as it may, under the teaching of "reasonable utilize," people might be allowed to make reinforcement duplicates or authentic duplicates of a few materials as long as specific conditions are met. Making a duplicate of a copyrighted work for your very own usability is probably going to be considered copyright encroachment. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you are making a duplicate so you may utilize a copyrighted item on the off chance that the first is stolen, harmed or devastated, your direct may fall inside the teaching of reasonable utilize.
Answer:
Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)
Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)
Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars
"WAAC calculation
Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.
so
Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)
= 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be calculated as shown below
Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars
Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.