Answer:
No impact.
Explanation:
In some countries, states do not have the autonomy to formulate their own laws. The US is not one of those. In the state territory, although there are laws that apply throughout the country, each state can formulate its own laws and these must be followed within the limits of the state and punishable by those who disobey. The law of each state must be judged in its home state and cannot be imposed on another state that does not accept that law as the rule to be followed. Thus, in relation to the above question, we can conclude that if state law in the neighboring state requires that interrogation be recorded on video, that law has no impact on state interrogation that does not require such recording.
Answer:
I think A is the answer to your question?
Explanation:
If richer regions can attract more investment than poorer regions because of their larger ex ante tax bases, then fiscal federalism adversely affects the growth prospects of poorer regions by reducing the resources available for either central or regional governments to fund valuable projects in poorer regions.Often geographical constraints, market imperfections, government policies, a lack of law & order, identity, per capita income and various socio-economic reasons can contribute to regional disparity such that some regions are more backward than other areas falling within the same nation
(hope it helps)
The answer to the question that you are seeking an answer to, is true.
