1. We can analyze the possible social benefits or consequences by creating a standard that deemed as 'desirable' social situation and measures the situation before and after the militarization.
If after the militarization our society got closer to the desirable outcome, we would say that the militarization produces a social benefit.
2. We could take a look at the example of American military occupation in Iraq.
Initially, we intended for the militarization to create a democratic country in iraq after we remove the dictator from power.
But it only resulted in a vacuum that attract many radical groups to came in to control the country. In this case, we can conclude that the militarization produce more consequences than benefit.
The question is kinda lacking. Probably, it has choices to make the question answerable.
Answer:
1) Using renewable as well as non-renewable resources judiciously and carefully. 2) By not damaging the environment such as deforestation and all types of pollution including water pollution,soil pollution,air pollution as well as noise pollution. 4) By not burning too much of fossil fuels.
Explanation:
follow me..........
The only exception to the rule that says that either the principal or the agent may terminate an agency relationship at any time arises in the situation of death or incapacity of the agent.
What is agent?
The term agent refers to employed of the agency to represent the client for sale the polices. The agent belongs to the service sector. The agent role play as mediator to the agency and client.
The agent is terminating the agency relationship in case of various circumstances such as death of agent, withdrawal of party, not trustworthy, renunciation by Agent, and not mutual consent.
As a result, the situation of the death or incapacity of agent are terminating the principle.
Learn more about on agent, here:
brainly.com/question/7495533
#SPJ4
Information systems have been mostly used to enhance the efficiency of administrative procedures in the local government sector as well as the central government sector. Information systems also help to improve transparency of civil affairs. The OPEN (Online Procedures Enhancement from civil application) system in the Seoul metropolitan government of South Korea has helped to achieve transparency in the civil administration by preventing unnecessary delays and unjust handling of civil affairs on the part of civil servants. The focus of this study is an administrative informatization at the level of the local government, not at the level of the central government. This paper, therefore, examines the success factors of the OPEN system, i.e., the powerful leadership of the city government, the development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), and citizens’ attitudes. In addition, this paper analyzes some barriers to the development of the OPEN system and its existing problems.
