A traditional economy is<span> an original economic system where traditions, customs, and beliefs shape the goods and services the economy produces, and also the the rules and manner of their distribution.</span>
Answer:
Net income= $24,550
Explanation:
The contribution margin ratio is <u>the result of deducting from sales all the variable costs, </u>expressed as a<u> percentage.</u>
<u></u>
<u>First, we need to calculate the total contribution margin:</u>
Total contribution margin= sales*contribution margin ratio
Total contribution margin= 103,000*0.85
Total contribution margin= $87,550
<u>Now, the net income:</u>
Net income= 87,550 - 63,000
Net income= $24,550
Answer:
219 sheets
Explanation:
D = 5000 per year,
d = daily demand = 5000/365 = 13.70 sheets
T = time between orders (review) = 14 days
L = Lead time = 10 days
σd= Standard deviation of daily demand = 5 per day
I = Current Inventory = 150 sheets Service Level
P = 95% (Probability of not stocking out) q=d(L+D)z σ T+L-1
σ T+L-1= square root (T+L)=5 square root 14+10= 24.495
From Standard normal distribution, z = 1.64 for 95% Service Level (or 5% Stock out)
q=13.70*(14+10)+1.64(24.495)-150
= 218.97 →219 sheets
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Reserves J: Excess reserves J: Loans J: Deposits ;Money supply
The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1